L92 intake, LQ4 Intake, Russell fuel fittings
#11
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Woodlands, Texas
The fittings are the same, but to get them to connect without these from Russell. You would have to shorten and weld the factory inlet fitting. And then the filter is to wide without bending the fuel rail inlet upward..this takes all the pain out of attaching them.
#14
damn... too bad that L92 wasn't for cathedrals, ie TBSS, I'd swoop it up.
On your TBSS intake, did you use your old LQ9 fuel rails and adapt them, or did you use the TBSS rails?
Any photos of how the C5 vette fuel filter mounts with the fittings you have for sale? Don't you need two of the black fittings?
On your TBSS intake, did you use your old LQ9 fuel rails and adapt them, or did you use the TBSS rails?
Any photos of how the C5 vette fuel filter mounts with the fittings you have for sale? Don't you need two of the black fittings?
#15
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Woodlands, Texas
damn... too bad that L92 wasn't for cathedrals, ie TBSS, I'd swoop it up.
On your TBSS intake, did you use your old LQ9 fuel rails and adapt them, or did you use the TBSS rails?
Any photos of how the C5 vette fuel filter mounts with the fittings you have for sale? Don't you need two of the black fittings?
On your TBSS intake, did you use your old LQ9 fuel rails and adapt them, or did you use the TBSS rails?
Any photos of how the C5 vette fuel filter mounts with the fittings you have for sale? Don't you need two of the black fittings?
Last edited by midevil1; Nov 7, 2011 at 04:48 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
c10, connectors, fuel, hp, intake, l92, lq4, number, part, returnless, sale, shortening, stock, tbss, truck




