GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

XR265HR in a 5.3 dyno graph and thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2012 | 02:42 AM
  #91  
LOBO2's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

My truck is mostly stock with a few mods (look at sig). If I installed the same cam as the OP used would the valve springs & pushrods be the only changes I would need to make? Would my stock converter be good? I don't have a tune, would I need one after the cam install?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2012 | 04:14 AM
  #92  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO2
My truck is mostly stock with a few mods (look at sig). If I installed the same cam as the OP used would the valve springs & pushrods be the only changes I would need to make? Would my stock converter be good? I don't have a tune, would I need one after the cam install?
This is a good mild cam for a dd. The stock converter work and you could use the same tune. But a retune will net more power. And even a stock truck will be so much better with a 2600 rpm converter.

Last edited by 1FastBrick; Jun 17, 2012 at 09:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #93  
LOBO2's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

So would a torque converter be a better move to make for my next mod?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2012 | 09:17 PM
  #94  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,592
Likes: 900
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO2
So would a torque converter be a better move to make for my next mod?
Depending on your mileage you may want to do the cam first. If you put a torque converter in a higher mileage trans and the trans fails, You may ruin the converter. At the very least, it would need to be cut open and inspected. If you plan on having the trans gone through, I would wait until then to do the converter.

The up side to this cam is that it still works well on a stock converter.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 04:58 AM
  #95  
LOBO2's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 8
From: Mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
Depending on your mileage you may want to do the cam first. If you put a torque converter in a higher mileage trans and the trans fails, You may ruin the converter. At the very least, it would need to be cut open and inspected. If you plan on having the trans gone through, I would wait until then to do the converter.

The up side to this cam is that it still works well on a stock converter.
Thanks for the help. I had never thought about it from that angle.

My truck is a 2004, but it is just now getting close to 27,000 miles. The trans should be ok I hope, lol!

BTW, even with the low miles on my engine would I still need to install new valve springs & pushrods with the cam?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2012 | 05:21 AM
  #96  
AndysC3's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 10
From: Minot, ND
Default

I would. The stock springs were not designed for aftermarket cams. Just added insurance. And their not that expensive. Cheaper than a new motor that's for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #97  
1BadAction's Avatar
Registered abuser
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 2
From: Briar, TX!
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Alright, it got late so I didn't throw any revs or anything but this is just the truck idling so you can hear what the small lope sounds like. It was recorded from about 5 feet behind the truck. The exhaust is a custom 2 magnaflow muffler setup in series, single 3" otherwise the vid is pretty self explanatory.

http://gonicd.com/videos/xr265_idleonly.wmv
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:46 PM
  #98  
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 8
From: Buford, GA
Default

I'm curious which best to run that cam 212/218 high lift or low lift?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #99  
NicD's Avatar
Thread Starter
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Default

Best is a very broad term without any qualifications. Best for what?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 11:35 PM
  #100  
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 8
From: Buford, GA
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Best is a very broad term without any qualifications. Best for what?
I just try to ask about that cam from low lift and high lift. From my understanding for high lift is high rpm around 6400 and low lift go past 6000 rpm. Which is good for n/a motor and later boost. I noctied lot of people run low lift.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.