GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Who here is running a FAST 102?

Old Nov 28, 2012 | 07:31 PM
  #1  
oakley6575's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default Who here is running a FAST 102?

I'm looking to break 500rwhp N/A and I'm thinking the only way to do it is with the FAST intake. I've heard all about the leaks and problems with them but I'm still considering it .

I haven't seen a lot of truck guys running the intake, only tech guys. Post pics, thoughts, dyno sheets, ect if you are running one. Thanks guys!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 07:37 PM
  #2  
Three6GMC's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 27
From: Corpus Christi
Default

I ran one on my turbo 5.3 but I put it on at the same time I went from 7lbs to 10 and I got a hell of a power gain lol. I never had any issues with it either. I would get one but would make it kinda last on the list. The gains are there for sure but for the money I'm sure you can find lower priced higher gain parts first. What is your whole setup?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 07:39 PM
  #3  
ltr450ryder's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 1
From: wi.... winters sucks
Default

mine fits no leaks or anything and it dynoed 502 and a slipping flt lvl 7 60e that died on the ride home only 25-30 mile drive and was slipping horrible and 531 it made with a rebuilt one but i dont like the tuner that did the 408 so im going to someone else in spring after the 80e is rebuilt and hoping for the same number witht he 80e
Attached Thumbnails Who here is running a FAST 102?-100media_imag0461.jpg   Who here is running a FAST 102?-100media_imag0505.jpg   Who here is running a FAST 102?-100media_imag0507.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:01 PM
  #4  
oakley6575's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Current set up is in my sig. The heads and intake are completely stock stock and untouched. The only dyno I put the truck on was the first day it was drivable after being built. It made 435rwhp and 400ft lbs. It left the dyno barely running so i don't know what to think of the numbers. They are probably close.

So far on the list, I have a 4" intake tube with card style MAF, WCCH stage two port on the heads, and maybe a mamofied FAST 102. I don't know how close that would get me.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
Three6GMC's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 27
From: Corpus Christi
Default

Well you wont be able to run the fast 102 rt intake with those heads you will have to get the car type intake... Shouldn't be too hard to hit 500 once you get everything on it squared away.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:27 PM
  #6  
oakley6575's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Yea I contacted FAST a year ago to see if they were going to make a rectangle port truck intake but they still haven't.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:40 PM
  #7  
milkey57's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 531
Likes: 4
From: Cedar Park, Tx
Default

I gotta a fast too, no complaints here, had it ported to match my heads too. Before the port work with the same heads and a Tv2 on my ls1 it put down 459 on a dynopac dyno. Now im shovin 14lbs down it without a problem.
Attached Thumbnails Who here is running a FAST 102?-photo-36-.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

car style FAST intake, 408 hadnt dynoed it yet but track passes calculated way north of 550 to the wheels !

my fully bolted 6.0 put down 480+
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
superchevy00's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Houston Tx
Default

I'm running the "car style" also. It takes a little work to make it fit with the stock pullys, but I think it looks a lot better than the lsxrt.
Name:  IMG_1349.jpg
Views: 706
Size:  159.2 KB

Name:  IMG_1348.jpg
Views: 311
Size:  130.9 KB
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2012 | 11:42 AM
  #10  
oakley6575's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by superchevy00
I'm running the "car style" also. It takes a little work to make it fit with the stock pullys, but I think it looks a lot better than the lsxrt.
I'm already running the LS3 intake so I've done the work to fit the car style intake. What are the specs on your engine?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.