What about these cam spec's for my 6.0

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 31, 2003 | 09:40 PM

#11

67SS509

10 Second Truck Club

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 812

Likes: 2

From: Whiteville, NC

216/220 with 114LSA is too big without tuning...just my 2 cents worth

Dec 31, 2003 | 11:45 PM

#12

BigTex

? ? ? ? ? ?

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 7,126

Likes: 2

From: East of Dallas

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67SS509

216/220 with 114LSA is too big without tuning...just my 2 cents worth

I agree. It will run, but on a heavy truck, you won't be happy with it until you are tuned.

Jan 1, 2004 | 11:00 AM

#13

Jorday

10 Second Club

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 1,724

Likes: 0

From: Fenton, MI

I agree the tuning will make a big difference. When I said you could probably go larger, I was thinking of how large the cam could be before it would cause problems until it was tuned.

Jan 1, 2004 | 06:37 PM

#14

99 2500

Thread Starter

Launching!

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 275

Likes: 0

From: TX

Thanks for the info guys, probably will go with something closer to what 1BADHD is getting, definately don't want to give up too much low end torque.

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Gen IV 5.3 for boost

JordanH

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Aug 8, 2015 07:59 PM

A Little Disappointed

OLD BULL

INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS

Aug 1, 2015 05:00 PM

another cam thread

steves86ta

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM

Lifter Noise?

GRRR65GTO

INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS

Jul 10, 2015 08:27 PM

Dyno Results seem right? LQ4 / S475

NuckenFuts

FORCED INDUCTION

Jul 9, 2015 08:45 AM