WCCH Stage 2 Cylinder Heads are Here! My Experience, Full Specs and Detailed Pics!
#82
Originally Posted by gamedawgx53
what are you making now?
how much are you expecting to get out of...
the heads?
minus the cam
how much are you expecting to get out of...
the heads?
minus the cam
Hopefully I can get a dyno run in before the 17th. I did log my one 1/4 mile pass and pulled 50lbs on the MAF at the top of second gear.
Bone stock I dyno'd at 243 rwhp, so hopefully I'm at least seeing 363rwhp, per Magnuson (+120rwhp). It certainly feels like I'm there, but then again, I have no hard data or proof yet.
I had never really thought of these heads in terms of what they would offer me alone. I had thought of my selection as a system. I wanted to make sure the Heads, Cam, and Headers worked together as such.
#83
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
Recently a customer dynoed his 6.0L Magnusson powered truck using our first designed port (which was a 235cc runner volume) and a 208º/210º cam. It dynoed at 472rwhp and 521rwtq making 8psi of boost.
Richard
Richard
Grippy, NOW you can come over so we can run 'em!!
#84
Originally Posted by Weedo
WOW those numbers look familiar!! (see sig)
Grippy, NOW you can come over so we can run 'em!!
Grippy, NOW you can come over so we can run 'em!!
sounds like a definite plan.
but I would run ya as sit now I just like having fun bro
of course, these heads are going to help my cause quite a bit
#85
I could use some help, getting these Stage 2 heads has made reconsider a short block, I posted this on another site too, any thoughts?
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks
#86
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by moregrip
I could use some help, getting these Stage 2 heads has made reconsider a short block, I posted this on another site too, any thoughts?
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks
If you are planning on 8psi of boost, you can run that without an intercooler and no meth all day long, everyday. With the Radix cooler, I'd think you would be fine with the higher compression. You might have to trade a few points of timing, but my motto is boost (i.e. dynamic compression) is better than timing any day -- admittedly more of a turbo point of view than traditional s/c mindset.
#89
TECH Veteran
I like it: Stage 2 heads + 220/224, .581/.581 cam + 10:1 comp. + 2.9" pulley =
You're going to wish you had the extra inch of rubber the Kumhos provide, though...
You're going to wish you had the extra inch of rubber the Kumhos provide, though...
#90
Originally Posted by moregrip
I could use some help, getting these Stage 2 heads has made reconsider a short block, I posted this on another site too, any thoughts?
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks
I am in a dilemma, I'm probably going to through some forged pistons in for good measure and I am seriously tempted to throw LQ9's in for the added compression.
with 74.5cc combustion chambers I will be sitting at a little over 9-1cr. I'm speculating whether the added point in compression or more timing with the lower compression will make more power(plus the little more volume with the lower cr)
I would normally pick the 9-1cr right away, however, BigTex seems to be doing alright with a 2.75" pulley and LQ9 pistons, as well as some others.
thanks