GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Tuning with Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2022 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
jclark10's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 361
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
I sympathize with your point. There's definitely a perfect storm of circumstances that has driven the tooner craze. Huge customer base, the average guy with a laptop not really knowing how most of the stuff works, the customer not knowing the difference between good and bad...and the overbearing confidence of the typical guy selling his services in the wake of all that, knowing that the performance of his product isn't tested against real standards and that any criticism of his work is met with claims that are unfalsifiable as far as the layman is concerned. How would Joe Customer know that E85 isn't "supposed to start bad"? Or that a big camshaft isn't "supposed to die when coming to a stop"? They only know what their dyno guy tells them for the most part, and that isn't much. And its really because the customers don't demand enough out of them. I tell everyone looking for a tooner to ask everything they can think of and really grill them before hiring them. Don't just bring it to them after a part is installed and take whatever they give you - ask how they plan on fixing the known issues that tend to accompany that mod, like a camshaft. And when they're done, check their work. And take any excuses with a grain of salt... There's a lot more to dialing in a camshaft than RPM and VE - because a larger cam does a lot more than just change fuel consumption and idle speed requirements.
Yes agreed, I should have worded it more like its very important to get the airflow model correct before doing anything first since a tooner isn't going to bother messing with VVE and then will fake the MAF curve to compensate for other inadequacies since its a simple 2D lookup table instead of multiple tables of coefficients.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2022 | 09:29 AM
  #12  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 642
Likes: 21
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by jclark10
Yes agreed, I should have worded it more like its very important to get the airflow model correct before doing anything first since a tooner isn't going to bother messing with VVE and then will fake the MAF curve to compensate for other inadequacies since its a simple 2D lookup table instead of multiple tables of coefficients.
Agree with you! I have fixed numerous tunes for driveability issues. They are dyno tuned typically. The tuner jacks the PE for WOT AFR and the fuel trims are all over the place. I once saw a stock LS1 with what I will call a 30/30/13 tune. 30 degrees of timing, 13:1 afr target and fuel trims were +30 everywhere. Car was so rich at WOT it rolled coal. I pulled some timing out of it, fixed the commanded air fuel by adjusting stoich to 14.1 to run about 12.5 on our E10, the tuned the VE and MAF tables. Car was a different car after.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
a.vinson
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
5
Oct 17, 2010 10:47 PM
pbplayer1
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
8
Jun 1, 2007 03:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.