GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,387
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, Texas
Default Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Let me start off by saying that I'm wanting to gain some nice torque if I were to swap cams. I also want to keep stock programming. Believe it or not, I tried this baby cam in my '98 T/A back in '99, and it didn't gain any HP over the stocker. It did, however, pick up an additional 15 RWTQ at peak. The stock '98 cam had .500" lift with 202/208 duration. Who knows what I'd gain over the stock '01 cam (been told it's 198/197, .478").

Crane cam: 208/216, .500"/.500", 114 LSA

More than anything, I'm really wanting more low-end and mid-range torque. I have 3.73's, FWIW. My T/A ran out of breath past 6k with this cam and a set of CNC heads. I think it would work out pretty well! thoughts???
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2002 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Honestly, that looks like a good choice. Will be on the mild side. Will probably idle and run like stock.

My LS6 runs great w/o tuning. Yours will have less lift, and a tighter LSA. That should help you out on the torque side, and give you a nice HP boost.

Specs for the 2001 LS6 cam are 207/216 on a 116 LSA and 525 lift.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 12:26 AM
  #3  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,032
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

If its a cam you already have I'd say go for it. If you have to buy it again, I'd go for a tad bit more. This coming from the guy who has a 234/242, .539"/.558" 112, sitting in front of him and not sure which car to put it in!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 12:28 AM
  #4  
-Joseph-'s Avatar
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,032
Likes: 0
From: Texas and Qatar
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

My further contribution, is that it will probably not even come close to needing tuning <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2002 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,387
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, Texas
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Yeah, I know that Jason 98 TA had the '01 LS6 cam in his 5.3L for a while, and it completely killed his bottom-end power. Thunder offers a Comp Cam with 206/212, .515"/.522", 112 LSA that shows a powerband of 800-5800 with excellent low-end power. I think the 208/216 cam will make more power at peak, but the 206/212 will definitely provide even more low-end grunt with the 112 LSA.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
Neil 6.0's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: as far away from Koonerville as humanly possible
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Here's something Brooke typed up a few weeks ago:

http://forums.pickuptruck.com/showfl...w=&sb=&o=&vc=1

Joseph, throw it in the LT1! LT1's need all the help they can get. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2002 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
GREGGO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,101
Likes: 0
From: League City, Texas
Default Re: Thoughts on this cam in 5.3L?

Here is a little discussion we had a while back at FSC. It might add a little to your thought to your selection. CLICK ME
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TXsilverado
FORCED INDUCTION
48
Nov 26, 2015 10:54 AM
LARRY01Z28
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
1
Aug 1, 2015 10:15 PM
lxcoupe
FORCED INDUCTION
1
Jul 27, 2015 08:19 PM
projectnightcrawler
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 19, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.