Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thinking of L92 heads for my lq4. Thoughts??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2013, 12:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
WhiteChevy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thinking of L92 heads for my lq4. Thoughts??

Thinking of going to l92 heads on my lq4.
My lq4 currently has stock 317 heads, 226/230 @600. 112+4 with a tbss intake and 90mm tb.

Thinking of going to L92 heads and l92 truck intake and milling the heads .030.

What u guys think??
Old 08-02-2013, 01:23 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

You will also want a new cam that will favor the exhaust a little more with the L92's.

IMO if you are doing a head swap, and changing all that other stuff, you might as well stick with the cathedral heads and get something that will outperform the L92's.

Seems like a lot of hassle for not a ton of gain for that swap IMO.
Old 08-02-2013, 02:32 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteChevy3
Thinking of going to l92 heads on my lq4.
My lq4 currently has stock 317 heads, 226/230 @600. 112+4 with a tbss intake and 90mm tb.

Thinking of going to L92 heads and l92 truck intake and milling the heads .030.

What u guys think??
Have you calc'd out the compression ratio with those dished LQ4 pistons? Seems like even if you milled the heads .030 the compression wouldn't be that great. I milled some L92's .030 and paired them up with some flat top pistons and got 11.3:1 so with a dished piston I think you'd be lucky to get 10:1.

Mike
Old 08-02-2013, 07:19 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If your going boost YES the L92s are worth it, otherwise dont even bother getting them. Stay with 317s.
Old 08-02-2013, 07:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Milling them .040 will put you at a 64cc chamber. I had a cam that I was told was a bad cam 244/248 .612/.615 112+2 for l92 heads and I went 10.64 in an extended cab truck in my old 10.6:1 compression motor. New motor is 11.8:1 compression and has a cam for these heads. 251/267 .623/.623 115+6 and I only gained 20hp..

So saying you have to have cam for these heads to work is irrelevant IMO.

I wouldn't hesitate to swap to these heads.
Old 08-02-2013, 08:14 PM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
WICKEDOWESIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO L92 heads in a 4" bore shroud the valves ( hence why they are in a 4.065" bore). Stick to some ported cathedral heads.
Old 08-03-2013, 12:01 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 37 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

glad this thread came up, I have a brand new rec port TBSS intake kicking around and just bought a LQ4
was debating on either putting my 799s on or getting a set of L92s
hope this thread makes up my mind
Old 08-03-2013, 09:52 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Your going to spend over twice as much on a ported set of heads than going with l92 heads to make the same power..
On my old 370 I picked up 45 hp going from 243 heads milled .030 to l92 heads with a cam that's supposively not for l92 heads.
Old 08-04-2013, 10:13 AM
  #9  
hog
TECH Fanatic
 
hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Woodstock Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WICKEDOWESIX
IMO L92 heads in a 4" bore shroud the valves ( hence why they are in a 4.065" bore). Stick to some ported cathedral heads.
The L92 heads do come in 4" bore application stock. LY6 etc.

peace
Hog
Old 08-04-2013, 10:37 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Mikey 97Z M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GREENSIERRA
glad this thread came up, I have a brand new rec port TBSS intake kicking around and just bought a LQ4
was debating on either putting my 799s on or getting a set of L92s
hope this thread makes up my mind
If your intake has rectangular ports then you must have a L92 truck intake, not a TBSS intake. To my knowledge TBSS's never came with rectangular port heads, only cathedral style.

Mike


Quick Reply: Thinking of L92 heads for my lq4. Thoughts??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.