GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

tech , cam only install reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #1  
2004SSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
From: southern california
Default tech , cam only install reliability

ok i know this is not reguarding a truck but it is for my car, which is an 02 ls1 camaro with a 40k mile ls1 bone stock with supporting bolt ons( 4.10 gears, kooks 1 3/4 lts with magnaflow cat, fipk, built t 56, ls6 intake and tr55 plugs, air system delete and yeah all bolt ons)

it is my DD and it has to be 100 percent reliable . and i think im just addicted to modding and adding power. it runs great as is and im pretty happy with it but i always want a lil more and i know i can pick up a good 50+ rwhp and my goal is 400+ rwhp and i know heads would help but they can be easily done at a later date.

the cam im looking into is a custom cam by pat g on tech. its a 22x/23x 60x/60x on 111 lsa. i want it to sound down right routy . which looking at specs it will . especially with a cutout.

im going to change the spirngs to patriot gold's . possibly extremes. ls2 chain ported oul pump and 42lb injectors mayne 38's since i have a set.

im just wondering how reliable i can keep this , spinning a bearing is my worst enemy . which i know is unpredicatable. but i want techinical reasons why i should ro shouldnt do this.

this cam isnt huge by todays standard but not small at all.

i was also looking at a 224/224 tr 112 cam which is proven but will make slightly less power.

so let the discussion begin.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
sonoma43's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
From: Saint Joseph, MI
Default

That 224/224 on a 112 will provide a decent dd while putting plenty of power down. However dont forget anything that is run up to 6500+RPM often wont hold up forever on stock internals, other than what you have mentioned. It all depends on how often you want to drive it, if it was me I've always thought bigger is better, but now Im noticing that is not the case all the time. I would maybe keep it on the conservitive side and go with something close to the 224/224. Just my .02
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 06:59 PM
  #3  
skyhighsami's Avatar
no title here
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 3
From: Montgomery, AL
Default

I think that cam would be too rowdy for DD duties you know? A big cam in a 6 speed blows!! If it hard to pull away from a dead stop. Atleast mine was with 3.42s although the 4.11s should help you out. I would go a little smaller if it were me
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #4  
charcold-bowtie's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,198
Likes: 0
From: Midland Texas
Default

I think it can be easily done, nice car(from the pics in the other thread. There was a bit of debate over the LS2 chain
Originally Posted by Rick@Synergy
Here are the pics for the chain.

You can see the chain is not a true roller and rather a split bearing design.



This was on a heads, cam c6 vette.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #5  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

sounds like a good cam, but you wont benefit nothing with that high lift and stock LS1 heads... but it will give you the chop sound that you want...... but in other words, go for it cause i like the chop sound also!! lol...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
Aug 29, 2016 12:48 AM
all_individual
Eastern
6
Oct 10, 2015 10:09 PM
chvy=power
GM Parts Classifieds
2
Jul 27, 2015 10:06 AM
Offroadunleashed
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
0
Jul 20, 2015 02:25 PM
all_individual
Silverado SS, Joe Gibbs Editions, SSR
1
Jul 13, 2015 11:01 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.