GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Switching Octanes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #11  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by CHEVY6000VHO
Yeah your right. The service department lied to me. They told me it would run fine on 87oct fuel.
This tells me they were wrong:
http://www.powerblocktv.com/crate/crate.html#12

Jim
its ok but as long as your motor is safe and no popped gaskets
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 10:40 PM
  #12  
goshawk23's Avatar
Truck addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,559
Likes: 0
From: Ocean Springs, MS
Default

when my truck was stock other than exhaust it ran worse on 87 than 89. it ran even better on 93. i am basing this off of mileage i got from the math i did and from the audible knock from the engine. 87 under wot made the truck sound like ****. 89 wasn't as bad but 93 gave me no engine noise from the valve train or where ever other. i'm not saying performance was better, just the engine seemed to run smoother and quieter with higher octane fuel. yes i did notice better mileage as well.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 05:09 AM
  #13  
BADMOFO's Avatar
Cuz I AM a BADMOFO
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,624,039
Likes: 0
From: Mission to Uranus
Default

Originally Posted by Colby 04
holy **** you have a lot of free time on your hands
No ****!
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 06:22 AM
  #14  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Used to run Sunoco 94 octane but they stopped carring that here. Now I use Citgo or Shell 93. NEver ran anything but 93+ since i had it.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #15  
JimS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
From: Galesburg Il
Default

Originally Posted by Out1aw
I did the calculations today and found that every fill-up would only cost me $5 more if I ran 93 octane fuel as compared to 87 that I run now. I also know that LS1 f-bodys are supposed to only run 93 octane to run correctly. So my question is: Is it worth the switch (hp and mpg wise) to 93 octane?

Thanks
Now that's one of the nice things about fi. That difficult decision just goes away! No more worries.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #16  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

TOO BAD WE DONT EVEN HAVE 93 IN VA BEACH RIGHT NOW... i HAD TO FILL UP WITH 87 AND PUT 2 BOTTLES OF 7$ OCTANE BOOST IN IT... THAT SUCKED...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03sierraslt
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
14
Oct 9, 2015 05:53 AM
turbo6c3
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:11 PM
2002_Z28_Six_Speed
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
17
Oct 4, 2015 01:34 PM
StrokeTheLS
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
Sep 29, 2015 08:33 PM
old motorhead
FORCED INDUCTION
3
Sep 29, 2015 08:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.