GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

stirring the intake pot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #11  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

Parish8
most na guys will probably see more in the 20rwhp gains area with a loss of low end to match. this intake is rated something like 3500rpm to 7000rpm.
Rhino1
I called Edelbrock and asked how the 3500-8000 rating would work on the smaller truck engines and they made a GREAT POINT: THAT RATING IS FOR A CARB SETUP......DUE TO THE SINGLE PLANE DESIGN, CARB SETUPS HAVE A HARD TIME MAKING POWER BELOW 3500 RPMS BECAUSE THE FUEL DOESN'T STAY SUSPENDED IN THE AIR AT THOSE SLOW SPEEDS ANDWHEN YOU RUN FUEL INJECTION, THE FUEL ATOMIZATION IS NO LONGER A CONCERN WHICH DROPS THE POWER BAND TO OFF IDLE TO 8000 RPMS.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #12  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
Why dont we hear about #8 going lean instead of 7, I guess the answer is runners arent identical?
Sometimes I wonder what GM engineers are thinking and why things are the way they are, with all the testing they do you would think this wouldnt be a problem.

Let me know when your hooking up the F1 race car intake and the 8 widebands I want to be there to see this
8 instead of 7
lets see
pay close attention to what happens right before 8 opens
4 and 3 just got thru opening
Im guessing here but I would say
the direction of the airflow changes pulling some from the very rear
then 8 and 1 open
8 has to overcome the momentum of airflow heading back toward the front
form 4 and 3

now 7 and 2 open
and since 8 was just open the momentum is going more toward the rear
therefore slamming 7 full of air
making it lean making it more apt to burn

I wrote the GM engineers about the truck intake designs
and all I got from them was a grey area response

Basically what they said is.. it wasnt designed for anything other than stock
and I would be better off looking into the aftermarket

cant remember exact words
but thats it in a nutshell


Parish,

all that you said is very interesting
and what you saw with your afr proves it for me

Id also like to see that thread you spoke of
If you run across it, do you mind posting it up?

as far as NA vs FI
seems like a FI setup would be less affected to a certain extent

my reason being, you are filling all voids and air flows to the point of least resistance
where NA you get the full effect and start suffering from low VE and pumping losses

but then on the other hand with extreme setups such as yours
it isnt much comparison

as far as how much its affected
I think it all boils down to airflow demand and percentages

extreme setups being more affected
im still trying to comprehend putting down 1000 through a truck intake


great input guys, thanks
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #13  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Bill I think you should buy the 8 wideband setup with individual injector control
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:32 PM
  #14  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

I was talking to Kano about the intake and it suddenly dawned on me like a light shot down and I had a revalation.

For the past year and a half I have been plagued by fueling issues and incosistencies with B1 always being leaner than B2. I have rewelded the entire exhaust, swapped/replaced 02's, even gone as far as mashing some welders compound around the bungs and collectors.
ITS THIS ******* #7 I cant believe after all this time I never saw that, I get spuradic kr sometimes at WOT B1 is always reading at least 40-100mv leaner. The real test is when I swap intakes and the problems go away. I know there are others out there with the same problem. **** the truck intake

Last edited by 02sierraz71_5.3; Sep 8, 2006 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:40 PM
  #15  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
Bill I think you should buy the 8 wideband setup with individual injector control

would be some good info...

Maybe one of our sponsors will
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:42 PM
  #16  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

when i was running the stock 02's with boost my banks were prety close. .03 or so variance.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #17  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
I was talking to Kano about the intake and it suddenly dawned on me like a light shot down and I had a revalation.

For the past year and a half I have been plagued by fueling issues and incosistencies with B1 always being leaner than B2. I have rewelded the entire exhaust, swapped/replaced 02's, even gone as far as mashing some welders compound around the bungs and collectors.
ITS THIS ******* #7 I cant believe after all this time I never saw that, I get spuradic kr sometimes at WOT B1 is always reading at least 40-100mv leaner. The real test is when I swap intakes and the problems go away. I know there are others out there with the same problem. **** the truck intake


Good point
Ive read quite a few threads with this same issue
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
when i was running the stock 02's with boost my banks were prety close. .03 or so variance.
I think that huge hairdryer you had strapped to the front might have helped push the air more evenly
some have the problem and some dont Ive been looking for a reason Im glad I found it now Im wondering why some have the problem and some dont. I do see it more in NA engines than FI though. Im gonna make a seperate thread.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 12:47 AM
  #19  
TurboBerserker's Avatar
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 1
Default

The Vic jr. has shorter runners, which means more power up top and less down low torque. Probably not so noticable in a 408 that makes a bajillion hp, but may be rough in the smaller cube engines.

Nice write up Kano.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 01:13 AM
  #20  
negativeswitches's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: belleville, il
Default

Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
The Vic jr. has shorter runners, which means more power up top and less down low torque. Probably not so noticable in a 408 that makes a bajillion hp, but may be rough in the smaller cube engines.

Nice write up Kano.
so would possibly a larger plenum help that out???

like CHarris's h2 t/b elbow??

-erik
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.