Shortblock and heads are here
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Yeah, just haven't researched to see if it was good for my new bore size. I knew it was either that, or a 1041. 1041 is a much better gasket - composite material. If TEA tells me I can use the composite gasket with the o-ring'd heads, that's the one I will go with. Just quite a ways from that stage, so haven't really worried about it yet. It'll probably be the 9199PT again.
#12
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
I'm using the 9199PT gaskets because TEA said use Graphite and Keith Craft said that I needed at least .052"compressed thickness to have a .037"piston to head clearance the 9199PTs should give .039"piston to head clearance.If you know of a better graphite head gasket let me know and I'll buy it.
#13
I think the felpro is a good choice. I'm not sure if the GM graphite gaskets are easy to get. I've had one set last year, but they were shipped with a head order from ARE, so I have no idea where they got them.
#16
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 1
From: memphis tn
I'm thinking it would only be worth it,if the throttlebody became a restriction.I talked to Apten,they said that the Radix supercharger is already ported,that there is very little they can do to improve the flow except maybe porting the intake tube.
#17
I got to lookin at my intake tube, if a larger TB is used, then I think the opening on the itake tube could be opened up a decent bit and still have good flow. I noticed the actual tube is larger than the opening. I think some of it is done to accomodate the bend in the tube right there as well. If I were to get a new TB, I would be doing some port matching with the Dremel.
whitt, the motor sounds wicked. I think I am fixing to build a high boost ls1, prolly stock ls1 cubes, just different pistons and rods and some mild heads. It will prolly be a while before that project wraps up though since so far I've got about 2k tallied up in my head and I still haven't counted for heads and the oops factor.
whitt, the motor sounds wicked. I think I am fixing to build a high boost ls1, prolly stock ls1 cubes, just different pistons and rods and some mild heads. It will prolly be a while before that project wraps up though since so far I've got about 2k tallied up in my head and I still haven't counted for heads and the oops factor.
#18
the motor combo sounds great, I've got the 6.0L sitting in the garage now, and I'm toying with the idea of waiting., and sending it over to AP engineering and have the build a 408 shortblock w/ it
#19
Originally Posted by whitt1
I just got the build sheet on my new shortblock,it's a 403 with Diamond dished pistons,Eagle crank,Scat 6.125" rods,steel main caps.ARP main and head studs and a Comp 228/234 .588/.598 115+4 cam.The heads are TEA 6.0 stage 1.5 with Comp 977 valvesprings,titanium retainers and Comp Pro Magnum 1.75 rocker arms.I'm also going to run Comp R lifters and push rods.With a .054 compressed head gasket it should have a 8.96:1 compression ratio.I'm planning to run it with my Radix setup and a Pro M maf.I guess I'll find out just how much power Radix setup can flow.
#20
Why did you choose the Radix over the Kenne Bell? From what I've read, it seems the Radix is designed more for stock applications and the Kenne Bell seems to be more for al out performance. There just seems to be more adjustablity/ potential with the Kenne Bell.
Is there any truth to this...
Is there any truth to this...


