GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 07:50 AM
  #1  
really slow truck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Default screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

well, i havent loaded it into excel yet since i just did it last night, but what i did notice was it seemed to run richer at part throttle and leaner at WOT.

w/ the screen out my o2s looked like they were staying around .92 - .93, and my ltrims were at around 8-12%

w/ the screen in my o2s looked like they were around .875 - .890, and my ltrims stayed anywhere from 0% - 3%

hmm... looks like i will be "borrowing" the maf off my moms avalanche and replace hers w/ the descreened one hehe <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">

bryan

*edited for typo*

[ January 02, 2002: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</p>
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 08:54 AM
  #2  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Thanks Byran for doing the investagative reporting on this. I knew that removing the MAF should have leaned the truck out, but it is nice to have a little proof.

Now where can I get one w/ a screen?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 09:13 AM
  #3  
oxidizr's Avatar
Moderator / Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Go rent one of those $19.95 U-hauls 4.8L Silverados...They wont know the diffeerence <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
Small price to pay for a screen...

Richard
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
really slow truck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

haha thats a pretty bad *** idea ox <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
really slow truck's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

yeah, but i still dont understand the wot readings, at wot the o2s were running richer w/o the screen. probably just because of the change in the path of the air w/o the screen there to even it out
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 01:22 PM
  #6  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

I was thinking of going to a dealer and taking a test drive. <img src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" border="0" alt="[devil]" />
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 07:50 PM
  #7  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Bryan - do the opposite and tap the AV with the screen, then tap it w/o the screen. I would like to know the result.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 09:17 PM
  #8  
bdubb's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

With my screen removed I am running around .94-.95 at WOT. I have it tuned to about .890 when I spray the wet kit. I also have not seen any knock retard or detonation in my truck with 93 octane...which is what I normally use anyway.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 08:13 PM
  #9  
Slammed'99's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Excuse me for being new to all of this. But could someone please expain to me what those numbers mean? What are they measuring excactly? What are you using to aquire these measurements? Thanks, Mark
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 08:47 PM
  #10  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: screen vs. descreened, ran some tests

Hey Mark. Any OBD II scanning software will work, but Bryan is using Autotap. He is measuring his O2 sensors during wide open throttle runs. Optimum number is somewhere around .89 to .91 These numbers are readings the computer gets from the O2 sensors that tell if too much or too little fuel is being added to the air coming into the motor. Bryan is looking to see if the O2 readings change by removing the screen on the MAF sensor.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.