GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Pulley Size is a direct coefficient to boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
Some backpressure is good, but with the blower, you need a lot less than if you were still n/a.
Cool, thanx Flyer...class is dismissed!
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #12  
Hoover87's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Default

I'm in WA at about 100 feet above sea level and with the stock 3.4 pulley I've shown 8-8.5 lbs of boost from day 1. Now that it is fall, today with a temp of about 45 degrees I was seeing 9+ lbs of boost with the stock pulley and the truck was pinging....pulled my foot out a bit to stop the pinging and held her right around 8.5 - 9 lbs. We took her out a few weeks ago in 30 degree weather and darn near hit 10 lbs of boost with the 3.4 pulley!...and of course it was pinging to beat hell. I think I might put a bigger pulley on it just to keep it from pulling timing and to get the boost closer to where the tune is. I'm curious which would make better power....the high bost, or a better running truck with less boost that I can lay my foot into.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #13  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

I think you should conside looking at your exhaust. It sounds like it might be restrictive if you're seeing that much boost. Maybe some true duals would help you out.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #14  
Hoover87's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
I think you should conside looking at your exhaust. It sounds like it might be restrictive if you're seeing that much boost. Maybe some true duals would help you out.
I had just about the same boost when I tried running it with open headers.

For kicks and to keep the pinging down with the cold weather, I put a 3.7 pulley on it tonight and it peaks at about 7 lbs now. I don't hear any pings now, but I can certainly notice less truck there when I jump on it from a slow roll. I'll drive it like this for a bit and see if the computer decides to adjust.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
James B.'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 3
From: 33.91° -117.48°
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
Freer flowing intake will give you better boost, but a constrictive intake will lower boost. A freeier flowing intake will drop boost, but a constrictive exhaust will raise boost...
This is all true and therefore excellent advice. (as usual Flyer) I haven't yet read the rest of the thread but I have some contributions.

"Boost" as we measure it is rarely an acurate measure of how much air is getting into the engine. There are many factors. The important thing is how much pressure you can get into the combustion chamber without detonating. Swapping a cam out, for example, to one with more lift will result in more air getting in with the same amount of boost. Comparing the before and after on a cam swap boost is typically observed to drop, meaning more air is getting through now than before due to less resistance.
Out-of-the-box cat-back systems are just about worthless on a boosted motor. These are sized for naturally aspirated engines. NA motors need some backpressure to keep combustion chamber pressures high enough to make good power at low RPM where velocities are low. That entire concept is totally different with forced induction. Where we have control over manifold pressure it is better to get to that critical threshold of combustion chamber pressure with boost rather than by restricting exhaust. Exhaust should be as open and free-flowing as space and noise tollerance allows for maximum power.
Besides a dyno or G-force run, the next best way to see what effect mods have made on engine performance is to look at mass air flow. Asuming that air is being kept at the right mixture with fuel, the more there is going in the more power is probably being made. Manifold pressure alone has too many other variables to be considered a measure of performance.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #16  
James B.'s Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 3
From: 33.91° -117.48°
Default

Originally Posted by dewmanshu
...hydroboost...I freaking love it. Expensive? Yeh figure spending around 600 for the product alone. It has it's own little whine too...LOL...minature SC under the hood. It's a custom unit... goto http://hydroboost.com/index.html and check it out, it answers most if not all questions on FAQ page. Give Paul a call to make sure your year is good...
Paul is one of the best people in this industry I have ever had the pleasure of working with.
Paul's HydroBoost on my truck improved the crappy OBS brake system so well that I almost crash into stuff when I drive a stock OBS truck! I still remember the first time I drove on the hydroboost, I was nose-diving for a few days!

There's a reason HD truck have always come with hydroboost and a reason why new 1500's do too - it's BETTER. There is a reason too why older 1500's did not come with it - COST.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maxspeed05V
GM Parts Classifieds
0
Aug 12, 2015 06:29 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
0
Jul 30, 2015 05:03 PM
jrplz
GM Parts Classifieds
6
Jul 9, 2015 12:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.