GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Post UR Recipe for 13sec N/A 5.3 truck!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #1  
sebcat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default Post UR Recipe for 13sec N/A 5.3 truck!

I'm new to the forum and it's pretty obvious that you guys are really well informed. I need to know if I can attain my goal with just a 5.3. Here are my requirements.

Must pass emissions.
Must be reliable (within reason of course, a tranny rebuild is already in the budget)

So far I have on order.
Full length Dynamaxx Headers (with cats) for an SSR
HPNtuner software

BTW my truck is an 04 Buick Rainer and weighs in @ 6,500lbs.

I get the feeling I'm gonna need a stroker, tell me it isn't so guys.

Sebastien
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
one03sierra's Avatar
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 1
From: league city texas
Talking

what does that thing run now
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

Check out the fastest truck list, particularly the N/A section. Are you sure that thing weighs 6500lbs? That thing is a pig, and I don't think you'll be able to do it with a NA 5.3. FI isn't so bad, what's your reason for keeping it NA. A radix kit is very dependable and you can get a damned warranty with it too!

Just out of curiosity, what gears does that thing have, and is it AWD/4WD???
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:25 PM
  #4  
04BlackSilverado's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: New England
Default

Isn't the 6500 the GWV on that??
My GWV is like 6800 i think but is weighs 4600 with me in it (I'm 215), So I think that it weighs a lot less!!

If it weighed 6500lbs you would need around 585 HP and 690 ftlbs torque @ the flywheel!!!!!!!
Wheras I would need 414 and 488.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #5  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

http://www.buick.com/rainier/features/specifications/

says 4600lbs

a stock 6.0 and a stall would get you real close and not cost much as all. if that dont do it then a few bolt on's would get you there for sure.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #6  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
http://www.buick.com/rainier/features/specifications/

says 4600lbs

a stock 6.0 and a stall would get you real close and not cost much as all. if that dont do it then a few bolt on's would get you there for sure.


Stock 6.0 with maybe a small cam too. The stall in your truck should be the same as a trailblazer stall which has been giving decent results behind 6.0L engines.

Welcome to the site.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 11:29 PM
  #7  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

I did a 6.0L LQ4 swap, LS6 cam, and tuning on a 4.8L yellow reg cab truck not too long ago, it's not much lighter than your buick.
I was very impressed with the results. He's running a 13.4 @ 98mph I believe.

So, I bet a 6.0L, 2600stall (i'm sure you drive it daily) and a cam will get you there with no problems.

good luck,

allen
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:44 AM
  #8  
sfj
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

well if you put a big **** cam in that thing you might be able to eak one out with probably like a 3000+ plus converter and some headwork with a bigger intake valve and such maybe mill em down a might. but i think you might just be able to eak one out with the ole 5.3 although like they say a 6.0 would work wonders on that thing
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #9  
BADMOFO's Avatar
Cuz I AM a BADMOFO
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,624,039
Likes: 0
From: Mission to Uranus
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS


Stock 6.0 with maybe a small cam too. The stall in your truck should be the same as a trailblazer stall which has been giving decent results behind 6.0L engines.

Welcome to the site.
I agree that this would be the most cost effective way also.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
Green Thunder's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
Default

On a prior 6.0 with a cam and a 200 wet shot of nitrous went 13.26 in a 62000 lb HD..

Cam and stage 2 ported heads w/ a 260 shot forged pistons on an otherwise STOCk bottom end 12.78

IMO:
I would say on yours, a 150 shot on a completely stock 6.0 with a cam and you will definately be there and would be safe on your motor..

If you ar ok with a little laughing gas..

If not, throttle body, air intake, headers, and a cam would get you close.. Cheapest would be the Nitrous.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.