GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Performance specs on all stock trucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
spitfire2332's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Flint, MI
Default

If I had to guess... 16.5 at best.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #22  
litreddevil's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,151
Likes: 1
From: From Houma La. Living n Ellisville Miss.
Default

all stock i just had cut my muffler off with a turn down
14.81 i think my mph was around 93 i will look for the time slip
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #23  
95ImpSS's Avatar
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by v8
whats it going into? and good luck!
It went in this...
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:47 AM
  #24  
La Chochita's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

All stock, 15.0 @ 91mph.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #25  
therat1989's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Default

15.0 stock!! wow...what was your 1/8 mile?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #26  
95ImpSS's Avatar
formerly 1BADC10 (12/14/2011)
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by La Chochita
All stock, 15.0 @ 91mph.
Got any pics of the Hedman shorties? How much... Forced to consider options, being that the 2264 Pacesetters do not fit right in the '86. Considering different headers compared to notching frame.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #27  
Dave68RT's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by ktmrider
Hard thing is that the 6.0L was only were installed in HD, SUV, and 3/4 ton+ trucks up until the VHO option in 05'. Nothing in a RC configuration. Might be an apples to oranges comparison.
Plenty of info on the 4.8 tho. Only difference on the motors is stroke, this is why the HP figures are close ( 270 vs 285 ) but the torque is huge ( 275 vs 320 ). The extra torque really gets these big rolling bricks going off the line faster.
VHO option was introduced in 2004
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #28  
therat1989's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Default

What about these 4.8's? What were yall running stock
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #29  
rippedcamel's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

Stock form best out of 5 runs I ran 15.42 in the 1/4mile with my 04 rc sb 5.3.

Sad thing is after adding a Magnaflow single in dual out & a K&N drop in I only pulled a 15.37@88.38! I only gained half of a 1/10 in the 1/4 mile after spending nearly $600 dollars! I assume that TQ mngmt has something to do with holding back those mods.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #30  
therat1989's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Default

15.42 is good. Although you should have picked up more than .05 seconds! I think the weather conditions/temperature may have been different.
Well 15.4 is what I should expect. I'm hoping my custom tune will help alot. Maybe .25.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.