GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

ok no more 6.0 for me. need a new cam for the 5.3 (big tex, anyone else)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #1  
SimpleManLance's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Michigan
Default ok no more 6.0 for me. need a new cam for the 5.3 (big tex, anyone else)

with the rasing gas prices i not going to do the 6.0 swap anymore.. it sucks but i cant afford the gas. but anyways my go fast parts are going into the 5.3. i have a custom ground cam from comp .218/.218 .563/.563 114lsa i am thinking this will be way to big for my 5.3. is this true? i dont really want to give up to much lowend because i do tow 2 quads and 2 snowmobiles. what cam would be good for me. i do however plan on either getting my trailblazer stall restalled or get a 3000 stall, once my trans blows. do you think a 214/214 or 216/216 might be a good cam for a 5.3, 3.73's?

Lance
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

I hear ya on the gas bullshit. Im thinking twice about doing my swap. Why not a 212/218 high or low lift?? Dont really need alot of stall for that. A 3K would compliment it very well though.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 12:20 PM
  #3  
PappyDan's Avatar
Tribe Shaman
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

i hate to say it, but i am thinking about taking off the blower and putting it back to a stock tune so i can run 87 again, this crap of spending $50.00 plus a tank for something that comes out of the ground is nuts.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
CAMMIN03''s Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 1
From: Athens, GA
Default

I dont think that cam is too big.... Alot of guys including me are running or are planning on running 224 224 563 563 112 on their 5.3
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #5  
one03sierra's Avatar
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 1
From: league city texas
Talking

i say go with the 212-218 or the 216-220 comp cams. i ran the 216-220. yes it will loose a tiny bit dwon low but not much. and i was getting 18 mpg on the highway with it. that was with a good tune. i have mine set up to run either fuel.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #6  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by TheLadiesMan
i have a custom ground cam from comp .218/.218 .563/.563 114lsa i am thinking this will be way to big for my 5.3. is this true? i dont really want to give up to much lowend ...
Funny you should ask me, thats the exact cam Ive been running in my 6L LQ9. I can say for a fact that its gotten a little weaker in the 1500 rpm range under loads. From 2000 rpms on, its fine and pulls well until 6300. With my little 2600 yank, its just right for a heavy 6L truck. That same cam in a 5.3 would lose more torque and pull to higher rpms. I'd be tempted to go with a 212/214 114 +0 comp XE high lift, or something similar in a 5.3. Bring it down just a bit more, to say a 208/210 115 XE high lift and youd have great idle and better gas mileage.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 03:01 PM
  #7  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

TeX
I agree.
I also believe you will have a stronger running truck with a mild 6.0 than a 3K stall large cammed 5.3.The 6.0 I believe would get mileage in a xcab 4x4
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
SimpleManLance's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
Funny you should ask me, thats the exact cam Ive been running in my 6L LQ9. I can say for a fact that its gotten a little weaker in the 1500 rpm range under loads. From 2000 rpms on, its fine and pulls well until 6300. With my little 2600 yank, its just right for a heavy 6L truck. That same cam in a 5.3 would lose more torque and pull to higher rpms. I'd be tempted to go with a 212/214 114 +0 comp XE high lift, or something similar in a 5.3. Bring it down just a bit more, to say a 208/210 115 XE high lift and youd have great idle and better gas mileage.
your the one that sold me in on that cam for the 6.0..

when i pull they trailers its mostly on the highways (2100-2300Rpms) so i just want something that wont really be a dog in that range.

the truck is still going to be my race truck, so i want somthing that is going to make some great power. those cams seem like they would be more of a torque cam.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
SimpleManLance's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, Michigan
Default

anyone else have any suggestions.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #10  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

i agree with 02denali about them comp cams
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.