Low, almost no backpressure
#21
No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
#22
No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
#23
#24
#27
If you wanna step down anywhere, I'd say go to 2.5" at the collector all the way to the Y, then go 3" single after they merge. IMHO, 3" collector piping all the way down, even if merging into a single 3" for the rest of the exhaust, is costing you exhaust gas velocity in the lower rpm's.
#28
I disagree with this. 3" Y pipe is huge on a 5.3L (unless we're talking about a seriously hopped up 5.3). Like I said, the 2.5" Y pipe and 2.5" collectors did great on my 6.0. There was absolutely no loss of SOTP power up top over the 3" collectors and Y pipe of the Pacesetter's when changing to the Dynatechs. The dynatechs seem to give me better pep around town and better throttle response.

Then you go and post this down below \/.
No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
#29
You totally missed the point of my first response to the OP, I wasn't telling him to run a 3" pipe from the collector back to the Y, there are many y-pipes (stock included) that run 2.5" into the Y, then 3" out (excluding stock y, I believe it is 2.75"). I WAS NOT Talking about the collector size, I was telling him not to step down the 3" Y-out to 2.5" as that would cause a restriction in flow, it's hard to get that velocity back as you're decreasing pipe cross-section. So, do you still dis-agree with me??? 
Then you go and post this down below \/.
Whats the deal?
If he want's his low end torque back then I agree, run 2.5" collectors to either a 2.5" IN /3" OUT Combined Y pipe, or run 2.5" Duals with an X or H pipe.

Then you go and post this down below \/.
If he want's his low end torque back then I agree, run 2.5" collectors to either a 2.5" IN /3" OUT Combined Y pipe, or run 2.5" Duals with an X or H pipe.

#30
Thats what I was referring about. Where not talking turbo motors here.




