GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Low, almost no backpressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #21  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #22  
BlueSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Mission Tx
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
well what if I keep the 3'' diameter but go to a single out instead of dual out? Would that help any?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #23  
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 1
From: Texas!
Default

Originally Posted by built408
backpressure is a myth
Back pressure is very real, particularly in big power adder (boost namely) applications! The myth is that these late model trucks and cars don't have enough after swapping to a LT header and ORY with a good catback.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #24  
BlueSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Mission Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Vids of it in action? I had 2.7 60ft times with a 13.8 1/4 mile times so you haven't lost ALL your low end!!
I have some vids but I couldn't figure out how to upload them. All I know how to post is this pic lol...



mine is the one closest to the camera
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #25  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

why's your tailgate down? That's your torque loss
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #26  
BlueSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Mission Tx
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
why's your tailgate down? That's your torque loss
you're joking right... lol
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #27  
PathfinderJr's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 721
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

If you wanna step down anywhere, I'd say go to 2.5" at the collector all the way to the Y, then go 3" single after they merge. IMHO, 3" collector piping all the way down, even if merging into a single 3" for the rest of the exhaust, is costing you exhaust gas velocity in the lower rpm's.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #28  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Exclamation ?HUH, you might be confused

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I disagree with this. 3" Y pipe is huge on a 5.3L (unless we're talking about a seriously hopped up 5.3). Like I said, the 2.5" Y pipe and 2.5" collectors did great on my 6.0. There was absolutely no loss of SOTP power up top over the 3" collectors and Y pipe of the Pacesetter's when changing to the Dynatechs. The dynatechs seem to give me better pep around town and better throttle response.
You totally missed the point of my first response to the OP, I wasn't telling him to run a 3" pipe from the collector back to the Y, there are many y-pipes (stock included) that run 2.5" into the Y, then 3" out (excluding stock y, I believe it is 2.75"). I WAS NOT Talking about the collector size, I was telling him not to step down the 3" Y-out to 2.5" as that would cause a restriction in flow, it's hard to get that velocity back as you're decreasing pipe cross-section. So, do you still dis-agree with me???

Then you go and post this down below \/. Whats the deal?

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
No, that's not a good idea. You may increase exhaust velocity by doing that, but a single 2.5" will be a bottleneck. I think unless you are crazy about changing the exhaust is to leave it how it is and then focus on increasing the output of the motor. This will compensate for the bigger flow capabilities of the exhaust. The TR220 is the most widely recommended 5.3L cam and from what I've seen gives the best balance of power throughout the entire powerband. That cam and a torque converter of your choice and I think you'll be very happy.
If he want's his low end torque back then I agree, run 2.5" collectors to either a 2.5" IN /3" OUT Combined Y pipe, or run 2.5" Duals with an X or H pipe.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 04:05 PM
  #29  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
You totally missed the point of my first response to the OP, I wasn't telling him to run a 3" pipe from the collector back to the Y, there are many y-pipes (stock included) that run 2.5" into the Y, then 3" out (excluding stock y, I believe it is 2.75"). I WAS NOT Talking about the collector size, I was telling him not to step down the 3" Y-out to 2.5" as that would cause a restriction in flow, it's hard to get that velocity back as you're decreasing pipe cross-section. So, do you still dis-agree with me???

Then you go and post this down below \/. Whats the deal?



If he want's his low end torque back then I agree, run 2.5" collectors to either a 2.5" IN /3" OUT Combined Y pipe, or run 2.5" Duals with an X or H pipe.
In that case, I must have misread your post. I agree with you. But I do think the stock Y pipe is 2.25" (at least on the NBS)
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 08:28 PM
  #30  
built408's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Back pressure is very real, particularly in big power adder (boost namely) applications! The myth is that these late model trucks and cars don't have enough after swapping to a LT header and ORY with a good catback.
Thats what I was referring about. Where not talking turbo motors here.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.