Leaking LSXRT
Apr 4, 2013 | 10:09 AM
#121
TECH Regular
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Its def sealed, there's no leaks at all. I did the same thing, each sequence 3 times before I moved on.
Im not blaming Justin for it, but I think its something that needs to be tuned in person. For him to look at logs, make changes, send em to me, me send back etc cantake a week or 2 to complete. Theirs no way he can spend just a set few hours trying to nail it out. I think its ones of those things that needs someones direct attention for a day to figure it out.
Im fairly sure Im gonna trailer it over the border to New Era, however, I just bought a new house, and want to sell my old one before I go wasting money on a truck
Im not blaming Justin for it, but I think its something that needs to be tuned in person. For him to look at logs, make changes, send em to me, me send back etc cantake a week or 2 to complete. Theirs no way he can spend just a set few hours trying to nail it out. I think its ones of those things that needs someones direct attention for a day to figure it out.
Im fairly sure Im gonna trailer it over the border to New Era, however, I just bought a new house, and want to sell my old one before I go wasting money on a truck
Apr 4, 2013 | 10:10 AM
#122
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Yah im not expecting perfection. However, in 7 or 8 years I ahve put on 12,000 KM on it, which is like 7000 miles, so Im not super concerned about amazing drive ability. As long as it will idle ok i'll be happy.
May 15, 2013 | 07:47 AM
#123
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Well after 2 tuners, and lots of wasted money we have concluded the Fast setup is dog ****.
So many report issues, so many reported driveability issues, I don't know how they continue to sell them. IMO they would only work good in a mild engine build. Yes they make great power, but you put a aggresive h/c combo and driveability takes a massive ****.
So many report issues, so many reported driveability issues, I don't know how they continue to sell them. IMO they would only work good in a mild engine build. Yes they make great power, but you put a aggresive h/c combo and driveability takes a massive ****.
May 16, 2013 | 09:59 AM
#126
On The Tree
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
May 24, 2013 | 12:45 PM
#128
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
I beg to differ my friend.
Mine has no leaking issues now, just far to aggressive to idle. IMOon a more stock truck ti would probably work, and I wouldn't even bother using a FAST 102mm...get a 90ish mm and I bet it would be OK.
The combo of the intake and TB is what is the issue, Im just sooooo far past trying to get it to work i wont bother using a smaller TB.
Mine has no leaking issues now, just far to aggressive to idle. IMOon a more stock truck ti would probably work, and I wouldn't even bother using a FAST 102mm...get a 90ish mm and I bet it would be OK.
The combo of the intake and TB is what is the issue, Im just sooooo far past trying to get it to work i wont bother using a smaller TB.
May 26, 2013 | 11:07 AM
#130
Thread Starter
TOTM: June 2007
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 7
From: Hamilton, Ontario
The standard car ones work great, just not the huge truck one lol
Definite drop in power back to stock, it sucks. BUT truck drives great and is super usable. Ive got a nnbs intake, and gonna get a 90mm edelbrock and give that a nhot
Definite drop in power back to stock, it sucks. BUT truck drives great and is super usable. Ive got a nnbs intake, and gonna get a 90mm edelbrock and give that a nhot