GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

i have search but to no luck (6.0 cam choice)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 10:11 PM
  #21  
viciousknid's Avatar
Where's the Beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 1
From: Dover, Oklahoma
Default

I have a 224/230 610/605 111+3 in my stock 5.3 and it made 340rwhp @ 6300-6400 and was holding steady at 6400 when we let out. Shifting at 6800. I'd gladly run that in a 6.0. Made more hp and tq over the entire curve than a 216/220 525/532 114.

Put together a graph that compared the 2 cams with the same setup. If I remember correctly the only difference is that the Comp 216/220 cam we dyno'd in 3rd gear with cutouts open and the Eps 224/230 we did in 2nd. Would have made more power in 3rd.

Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 10:39 PM
  #22  
greenz71's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Cynthiana, ky
Default

What springs are you running with that eps cam?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 01:39 AM
  #23  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Originally Posted by viciousknid
I have a 224/230 610/605 111+3 in my stock 5.3 and it made 340rwhp @ 6300-6400 and was holding steady at 6400 when we let out. Shifting at 6800. I'd gladly run that in a 6.0. Made more hp and tq over the entire curve than a 216/220 525/532 114.

Put together a graph that compared the 2 cams with the same setup. If I remember correctly the only difference is that the Comp 216/220 cam we dyno'd in 3rd gear with cutouts open and the Eps 224/230 we did in 2nd. Would have made more power in 3rd.

Thats a big *** cam in a 5.3! How it is down low? Do you have any drivability issues? How high do you rev that thing??
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 01:41 AM
  #24  
A Low Dime's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
From: Arlington (DFW), Texas
Default

Thats an awesome graph!! Great way to see the differences, I wish you they both would have been in 3rd, but still shows enough gain regardless.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 10:29 PM
  #25  
bluebommer07's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 2
From: donaldsonville,la
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
Thats basically the same cam I'm running and I love it. Mine has slightly different specs and I had it done custom by Pat G. Its got a slightly wider LSA with a cam lobe that is designed to make less noise on the exhaust side.
what do u mean less noise on exhaust side?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 10:41 PM
  #26  
grey matter 04's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: gonzales,LA
Default

Originally Posted by bluebommer07
what do u mean less noise on exhaust side?
used pat g and geoffs lobe that is easier and smoother on valvetrain
Read on EPS website the solution explains

http://www.engpwrsys.com/tech-notes/cam-design.html
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 06:07 AM
  #27  
bluebommer07's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 2
From: donaldsonville,la
Default

Originally Posted by grey matter 04
used pat g and geoffs lobe that is easier and smoother on valvetrain
Read on EPS website the solution explains

Engine Power Systems, 2010 Camaro Parts, 2010 Camaro Accessories, LS1, LS2, LS3, LS6, LS7, LS9 Dyno Tuning, Custom LSX Camshafts, Baton Rouge Louisiana - Cam Design
just read it now it makes more since on why he said that thanks. for pointing that out
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 08:14 AM
  #28  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

222/226 shift it at 6500 an let it do what it does if you want a torque setup run the trucker cam (high lift) an let it ride. No need to over cam a truck that isnt a race truck muchless put a cam you have to spin to 6800-7000 to get peak power out of.


Ive told you a million times the 222/226 is the biggest id run without a set of heads. You're wanting a budget build an ive pointed it out a ton of times.


243s stock
222/226 eps cam or trucker high lift
3000-3200 converter
Leave the 3:73s an put a tru-trac.
Do your other bolt ons and leave it alone.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 09:48 AM
  #29  
bluebommer07's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 2
From: donaldsonville,la
Default

Lmao I know its been more like a billion times u told me, but I just wanted to see what everyone options were to a simple build.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2012 | 10:15 AM
  #30  
Vortec350ss's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,271
Likes: 62
From: South Shore, MA
Default

Originally Posted by iamkeniff
222/226 shift it at 6500 an let it do what it does if you want a torque setup run the trucker cam (high lift) an let it ride. No need to over cam a truck that isnt a race truck muchless put a cam you have to spin to 6800-7000 to get peak power out of.


Ive told you a million times the 222/226 is the biggest id run without a set of heads. You're wanting a budget build an ive pointed it out a ton of times.


243s stock
222/226 eps cam or trucker high lift
3000-3200 converter
Leave the 3:73s an put a tru-trac.
Do your other bolt ons and leave it alone.
I like the sounds of that build... it would run real strong in your truck. Like 12's with good weather and traction...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.