GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #1  
006rcsb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: bakersfield, ca
Default headers

I know you guys on here are all into traditional headers and you all like the pacesetters and obx's and then there are the new lpp's but i found these and would like to know what you think. They are tri-y headers made by clear image automotive and they use all ball/socket flanges for a complete bolt on install and are available in 1 5/8 or 1 3/4 primarys and have 3/8 thick flanges and are 14guage tubing. I guess what I want to know is what the pros and cons to both styles is.




Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Tri-Y headers like the ones you posted are traditionally better for low to midrange while conventional longtubes free up more power in the upper RPM's. Theoretically, for a truck that craves low end torque, a tri-y header would be better suited.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #3  
andrew383's Avatar
traveling mod
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 1
From: so. indiana/texas
Default

$1300 for coated mild steel with cats-id rather have dynatechs.
$1000 for uncoated mild steel catless-id rather have dynatechs.

you could buy LPP's and a cam and be better off...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:30 PM
  #4  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Whew! That's a huge pricetag for some headers that aren't even stainless!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
006rcsb's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: bakersfield, ca
Default

yeah i wasnt really concerned with the price comparisson. more or less concerned with the design and the function, it seems like its not a bad style, its been used by dougthorleys for ever and was wondering why i dont see more of them seeing as how we are modding trucks, even though i say modding its more like trying to turn trucks into race cars...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #6  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

WOW thats alot of money for them.. They are more suited for a low end, tq then all out flow... I wouldn't dump that kinda money on a header that isn't stainless...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:54 PM
  #7  
BuyAmericanIron's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Metamora, IL
Default

I have to agree with the others who have posted. You should have good low end torque, just what you need for a daily driven truck, but the price does seem a bit high for the product. The Tri-Y header is a proven design that just never seemed to catch on. I would like to see some dyno numbers with this header.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 05:39 AM
  #8  
skipperdaddy's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales, LA
Default

Hate to sound redundant but the low end tq thing is what tri-ys are known for but im intrested in seeing some dyno numbers on these myself....
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 06:28 AM
  #9  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 17
From: Dallas
Default

Those are the single best flanges money can buy - exactly the same as what the general uses. I don't like the tri-y thing though.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 07:35 AM
  #10  
BigCountryx's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge
Default

and the generals flanges still leak a little, haha.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.