GMS maf tuning vs HPP tuning, results!
#1
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
I posted earlier about setting an SES light using the HPP 93 tuning and the GMS maf. It took about 30 miles to set the SES light with the tuning combo and the SES light went out about 30 miles after taking all the HPP tuning was out. I'm only using the raised shift points and firm shifts now. With the HPP 87 tuning and stock maf, my truck ran 0-60 in the 6.5 range. With the HPP 87 tuning and GMS maf, my truck ran 0-60 in the 6.4 range. With the HPP 93 tuning and the GMS maf, the SES came on after 30 miles, no 0-60 runs. Now with no HPP tuning (only raised shift points and firmer shifts) and the GMS maf, my truck is running 0-60 in the 6.3 range. It looks like the HPP and GMS tuning may fight one another, my truck really seems to be running well now. The rest of my mods are in the sig..
Jim
Jim
#2
HPP3 and GMAS are bad mods together. Each leans out the truck and both lean it out too much and rob power. That's probably why you were getting codes. They may have been lean codes, which the pcm would clear after one of them was off and the truck wasn't lean. You're air injection/O2 sensor code could have been the O2 sensor going quirky b/c of the lean condition.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GXPJAY
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
5
Feb 13, 2022 08:15 AM
Corvette454l88
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
19
Sep 1, 2016 01:24 AM
noproblems209
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
12
Aug 10, 2015 06:57 PM




