GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Exhaust theory question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #1  
swift700's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 938
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
Default Exhaust theory question

I've been wondering something lately. If you had, for instance, an exhaust system that started with good flowing manifolds and then went down to say 2 1/2" collectors and then into a 3" Y-pipe, would it do any good to go up to a 3 1/2" pipe after that?

Basically what I'm asking is: is there any point in increasing a pipe size after it's been choked down to a smaller size previously? I'm thinking not, but then again I tend to wonder whether the reduction in friction for the rest of the way back would help a bit.

What do you think, guys?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #2  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 31
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by swift700
I've been wondering something lately. If you had, for instance, an exhaust system that started with good flowing manifolds and then went down to say 2 1/2" collectors and then into a 3" Y-pipe, would it do any good to go up to a 3 1/2" pipe after that?

Basically what I'm asking is: is there any point in increasing a pipe size after it's been choked down to a smaller size previously? I'm thinking not, but then again I tend to wonder whether the reduction in friction for the rest of the way back would help a bit.

What do you think, guys?
Not really. If anything, you can go down in size further back in the exhaust and not have any more restriction. The reason is the further the exhaust travels, the cooler it gets and the mass gets smaller, so there is less volume to flow. So no real benefit from staying the same let alone going bigger...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #3  
axekick's Avatar
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 435
Likes: 2
From: Austin, Tx
Default

Sometimes its better to have a smaller pipe because it increases the velocity of flow which these motors like at higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

Originally Posted by swift700
I've been wondering something lately. If you had, for instance, an exhaust system that started with good flowing manifolds and then went down to say 2 1/2" collectors and then into a 3" Y-pipe, would it do any good to go up to a 3 1/2" pipe after that?

Basically what I'm asking is: is there any point in increasing a pipe size after it's been choked down to a smaller size previously? I'm thinking not, but then again I tend to wonder whether the reduction in friction for the rest of the way back would help a bit.

What do you think, guys?
are you figuring out a exhaust for the truck in your sig? if so i would think that setup would need to flow, if your manifolds are 2.5 inch i would open it up to 3" right at the collector, one thing i learned was anything that produces somewhat good horespower needs a good flowing exhaust. you dont wanna down size pipe anywhere in a setup. anytime you down size, it becomes a restriction and forces gases back towards the motor which in terms causes to much back pressure which chokes the motor..your exhaust is just as important as picking a cam
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #5  
swift700's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 938
Likes: 2
From: Calgary
Default

if your manifolds are 2.5 inch i would open it up to 3" right at the collector
At the collector the pipes are only flowing exhaust from half the engine so I wouldn't think they'd need to be that big. I think the y-pipe would be a squeeze point in mine.

I'm really just asking for curiosity's sake. I see guys going to 4" pipes but I'm wondering if the Y piping ahead of that flows so well as to make it worthwhile. I guess that if it was a double 3" into a 4" single then the Y would be perfect.

The theory of cooling exhaust and smaller mass makes perfect sense. Thanks guys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
08lambochevy
FORCED INDUCTION
15
Aug 7, 2015 11:42 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
FlowmasterMufflers
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Jul 17, 2015 03:26 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Foreign Performance Discussion
0
Jul 9, 2015 12:23 PM
FlowmasterMufflers
Foreign Performance Discussion
0
Jul 9, 2015 12:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.