GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dyno'ed the mule yesterday

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #1  
Quikenuf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Brusly Louisiana
Default Dyno'ed the mule yesterday

2002 GMC SCSB
5.3 stock internals.
E-fans, custom 4in. intake
thorley headers, custom Ypipe. no cats.
single 3in exaust w/ cut out open
only tuning was rev limiter at 6000, cheapo gas
temp 94 degrees and around 80% humidity.
Hp-263.7
trq-270.2.
Torque seems a little low, but the hp is about what i figured. what can i do to get that torque number up? I still have stock pulleys, and the only reason for not tuning it was i just got the truck back from the dealer for warranty work and its so damn hot, i dont see much use. I know i could have gotten more out of it, but i just wanted a baseline b4 cam springs and thunder racing tune.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #2  
02Reaper's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 780
Likes: 1
From: Swainsboro GA
Default

Can you post the dyno graph?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
Default

Also I have a question about your sig. You ran a 13.7 with a stock 5.3 N/A ?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
F8L Z71's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

That sounds about right. Grats

That's 20rwhp or so higher than my truck stock with just a K&N so it sounds good to me.


As for the ET and MPH, no way that was on the stock setup unless that truck only weighs 3700lbs or less.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #5  
Quikenuf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Brusly Louisiana
Default

The dyno setup was no tuning except for rev limiter and speed limiter moved up. i work very hard with tuning timing and fuel at the track that i had set back to stock when i took the truck in for warranty work. none of the tuning was there b/c i just got my truck back friday. also dyno time was 94 degree heat and about 80% humidity which is going to kill power also. I ran my best time In January, at 37 degrees and around 25-30% humidity. i do alot of ET reducers at the track that the dyno numbers are not going to reflect. in ex: slicks weight reductionand a short belt that was not run on dyno, couple traction mods too. Yes its very possible to run my times on a stock internals 5.3. Have you ever heard or Lotsofn? while he had his truck, he was running 13.20s at 100.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #6  
goshawk23's Avatar
Truck addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,559
Likes: 0
From: Ocean Springs, MS
Default

yea lotsofun had that truck running mighty quick for stock internals. i have been witness to it run at thundershootout.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #7  
Dark Halo's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by goshawk23
yea lotsofun had that truck running mighty quick for stock internals. i have been witness to it run at thundershootout.
maybe there is some hope for my 4.8 after all
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #8  
F8L Z71's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Notice I said stock. Not stock internals. and I did mention weight reduction. Weight reduction is the same as adding HP
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #9  
SnakeOiler's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 17
From: F'burg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Quikenuf
thorley headers, custom Ypipe. no cats.
single 3in exaust w/ cut out open

Hp-263.7
trq-270.2.
Torque seems a little low, but the hp is about what i figured. what can i do to get that torque number up?
Would the lack of backpressure cause your low tq number?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
Default

Originally Posted by Quikenuf
The dyno setup was no tuning except for rev limiter and speed limiter moved up. i work very hard with tuning timing and fuel at the track that i had set back to stock when i took the truck in for warranty work. none of the tuning was there b/c i just got my truck back friday. also dyno time was 94 degree heat and about 80% humidity which is going to kill power also. I ran my best time In January, at 37 degrees and around 25-30% humidity. i do alot of ET reducers at the track that the dyno numbers are not going to reflect. in ex: slicks weight reductionand a short belt that was not run on dyno, couple traction mods too. Yes its very possible to run my times on a stock internals 5.3. Have you ever heard or Lotsofn? while he had his truck, he was running 13.20s at 100.
You ran a 13.7 with weight reduction ? What did you take off ?
The bed? I am really curious not doubting.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.