dyno'd -> 409hp / 540 ft/lb torque
12-24-2004, 04:57 AM
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i say bigger springs and another thing on a FI motor (not so much with turbos) but the more you dyno it the hotter it gets and FI motors do not like heat. it should not make as much of a difference because of winter time but might be another reason you dynoed down from your first. i bet if you gave it another run it would have done the same thing again lost a little power
12-24-2004, 08:46 AM
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THat's some rpetty good numbers! On the back of the cam should be some numbers. If it was a GM cam it would have had a 3d bar code looking thing laser etched in, CompCams have a number with the letters HR in it. If you give them those numbers they will tell you exactly what the cam is.
If it was a 216/220, stock springs wouldn't be any good for that, trust me. LS6 springs are pushing it, but the 918's will be fine.
If it was a 216/220, stock springs wouldn't be any good for that, trust me. LS6 springs are pushing it, but the 918's will be fine.
12-24-2004, 09:50 PM
#19
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
@ what rpm did you make 540 ft lbs? 
