DYNO GRAPHS - Stock '02 4.8L vs 5.3L V8 motors
Oct 21, 2010 | 02:13 PM
#22
Hi guys, am I reading your graph right? Is the LS1Tech print out wheel HP or crank? I was just comparing V8 US engines regarding torque, HP and fuel consumption to my new Corrado VW 2.0 TSI engine and it seems to me that the main purpose of these V8 is fuel to noise conversion rather than creating torque or HP.
This graph is a 2010 4 cylinder VW 2.0L TSI engine and has the GM5.3L max torque of 264 ft/lbs (360Nm) already at 2600rpm instead having it at 3800rpm.
The 2.0L VW has also a max torque of 287 ft/lbs and has the max HP of the V8 at 4000rpm instead of 5000rpm.
But maybe I am just reading it wrong, converted it wrong or am I just comparing wheel HP to crank HP? But torque should be still the same then because you always put the gear ratio into the dyno no matter what you meassure, right?
This graph is a 2010 4 cylinder VW 2.0L TSI engine and has the GM5.3L max torque of 264 ft/lbs (360Nm) already at 2600rpm instead having it at 3800rpm.
The 2.0L VW has also a max torque of 287 ft/lbs and has the max HP of the V8 at 4000rpm instead of 5000rpm.
But maybe I am just reading it wrong, converted it wrong or am I just comparing wheel HP to crank HP? But torque should be still the same then because you always put the gear ratio into the dyno no matter what you meassure, right?
Second, you dug up an 8 year old thread.
Third, the dyno is wheel horse power.
Forth, The TSI appears to be a turbocharged engine, No?
Fifth, from http://www.arinahnell.com/other/vw/tech/20tsi.pdf
HP: 200hp@5100-6000RPM
TQ: 206ft-lbs@1700-5000RPM
For 2002 5.3
HP:285HP
TQ:325ft-lbs (can't find RPM)
Sixth, there is an entire section devoted to dyno comparisons. Check it out.
This would be an apples-to-oranges comparison
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lxcoupe
FORCED INDUCTION
8
Jul 21, 2015 02:12 AM
FlowmasterMufflers
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Jul 17, 2015 03:26 PM
lxcoupe
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
17
Jul 14, 2015 10:14 PM
