GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Dyno Estimates??

Old Jan 13, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #61  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

The 346 with th T70 made 630hp/610tq on 10lbs.Since then we have run it at 14lbs and figure it's at 700+hp going by the gains we got going from 8-10lbs.All done on 93 pump gas.

The little 4.8 will surprise a few.We decided on a compression of 8.8-1 but will bleed some more down with the Cam so we can run 14-16lbs on 93 pump gas.I'll be tuning the car for the track/road so I'm sure the dyno #'s won't be that impressive because a dyno tune is completely different and won't run as fast at the track.

11's shouldn't be a problem I would like to see 10's though
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #62  
8ALTNG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

The man has spoken
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #63  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

this will be a fun project to watch. i think with race fuel and a bone stock 4.8 other than valve springs i would have been well into the 11's. not really sure where that will put you since there are several diferences to your set up. i think 10's on pump gas will be a real challange.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #64  
8ALTNG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

That is why we all do these truck isnt it??? Because they are a challenge. I jsut cant wait to see the look on some lightning owners faces when I wax their a$$'s. It going to be a good, fast summer.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #65  
8ALTNG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

Does anybody think that I would benifit from a smaller turbo instead of the gt67???
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #66  
TigerFan187's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

My buddy CRAZYCUTER4.8 was running 12.6's in his 03' EC 4.8(212.218.ls6 springs,shorties,intake,exhaust,3.73,g80,ls1edit,a nd 170 worth of n20) and he was putting down 488rwhp with a 220 shot.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #67  
8ALTNG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

Originally Posted by TigerFan187
My buddy CRAZYCUTER4.8 was running 12.6's in his 03' EC 4.8(212.218.ls6 springs,shorties,intake,exhaust,3.73,g80,ls1edit,a nd 170 worth of n20) and he was putting down 488rwhp with a 220 shot.
Thanks. but i was wondering about my turbo size selection. anybody got an idea??
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #68  
parish8's Avatar
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Default

with a front mount that size would be fine but a rear mount i have no idea about.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 03:47 AM
  #69  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Originally Posted by LTNKLR01
Does anybody think that I would benifit from a smaller turbo instead of the gt67???
I would be more worried that the 67 might be too small
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #70  
8ALTNG's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,647
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
I would be more worried that the 67 might be too small
gt67 TOO SMALL !!!!! that can only mean one thing
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.