GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Difference between 4.8 & 5.3 pistons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #1  
street demon2k3's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Palmview, Tx
Default Difference between 4.8 & 5.3 pistons?

I tore apart my bro's '01 4.8L truck for a cam install along with new lifters and noticed the pistons are flat with just a small hole no more than 1/8th of an inch wide on the center left of each piston.
While I was installing everything my friend was doing a H/C swap on a 5.3L truck; which I noticed the pistons seemed to be smaller(IDK) and were dished similar to the LQ4's(see pic) Ive seen before.

Why the difference in pistons, I thought the 4.8L had lower compression than the 5.3 which have similar heads I assume?

Name:  LQ4pistons.jpg
Views: 21808
Size:  93.9 KB
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #2  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I thought that the compression was the same, but I'm not sure. I do believe that there is a different stroke between the 5.3 and 4.8, and a different wrist pin location.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
droppedchev's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Coventry ,RI
Default

4.8s have flat top piston 5.3 have dish and the stroke is different by like .30
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #4  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,580
Likes: 891
From: JunkYard
Default

compression is similar between the 2 but the the rod length and stroke change between the 2 displacements. This requires a change in piston design to keep the compression simillar. If you want to bump the compression use a 4.8 piston with the 5.3L
Try this on for size... LOL All the math has been done in this post...

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...7&postcount=25
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #5  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
compression is similar between the 2 but the the rod length and stroke change between the 2 displacements. This requires a change in piston design to keep the compression simillar. If you want to bump the compression use a 4.8 piston with the 5.3L
Try this on for size... LOL All the math has been done in this post...

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...7&postcount=25
Exactly, this was answered in a recent post, let me look for it and I will post. The 4.8 pistons are the exact same as the 5.3 H.O. (L33) pistons, same compression height, same dome displacement. FastBrick is correct, smaller volume displaced in the 4.8 requires a smaller volume at TDC to achieve identical compression ratio. Since the 4.8 and 5.3 (standard output) share the same combustion chamber volume, the 4.8 needed to reduce the total volume in the cylinder at top dead center, thus pistons with less dish (flat tops) than the 5.3.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,580
Likes: 891
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
Exactly, this was answered in a recent post, let me look for it and I will post. The 4.8 pistons are the exact same as the 5.3 H.O. (L33) pistons, same compression height, same dome displacement. FastBrick is correct, smaller volume displaced in the 4.8 requires a smaller volume at TDC to achieve identical compression ratio. Since the 4.8 and 5.3 (standard output) share the same combustion chamber volume, the 4.8 needed to reduce the total volume in the cylinder at top dead center, thus pistons with less dish (flat tops) than the 5.3.
click the link I posted above... I saved you 4 pages of BS
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #7  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,580
Likes: 891
From: JunkYard
Default

BTW to street demon2k3... those dots on the side of the piston indicate the forward position of the piston in relation to the block. The center is just a casting or machining mark left be hind

Last edited by 1FastBrick; Mar 15, 2009 at 01:49 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #8  
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 10
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
BTW to street demon2k3... those dots indicate the forward position of the piston in relation to the block.
Beat me to it!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #9  
1FastBrick's Avatar
Custm2500's Rude Friend
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,580
Likes: 891
From: JunkYard
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
Beat me to it!
I decided to make it a little more clear too...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2023 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
littlehawk956's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
compression is similar between the 2 but the the rod length and stroke change between the 2 displacements. This requires a change in piston design to keep the compression simillar. If you want to bump the compression use a 4.8 piston with the 5.3L
Try this on for size... LOL All the math has been done in this post...

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...7&postcount=25
According to JE pistons this is incorrect. All LS rods are 6.098 inches in length except for the 4.8L truck engines and the LS7. The 4.8L rod is longer at 6.298 inches to allow GM to use the same compression height between the 4.8L and 5.3L even though, as we’ve seen, the 4.8L and 5.3L pistons are not the same.

Here is where i got this information.
Everything You Wanted To Know About The GM LS Engine Family | JE Pistons


4.8 Specs
4.8 stroke: 3.268
4.8 rod : 6.298
4.8 deck height: 9.240

5.3 Specs
5.3 stroke:3.622
5.3 rod: 6.098
5.3 deck height: 9.240

Now do the math: the centerline of the cank is half the stroke of couse and the deck height is measured of the centerline of the crank.

5.3 Stroke 3.622/2 = 1.811
4.8 Stroke 3.268/2 = 1.634

5.3:
1.811 + 6.098 = 7.909
9.240 - 7.909 = 1.331 Pin Height

4.8:
1.634 + 6.298 = 7.932
9.240 - 7.932 = 1.308 Pin Height

Last edited by 1FastBrick; Sep 15, 2023 at 06:10 PM. Reason: Added back for clarification of stupidity....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.