GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Comp Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #31  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

that second one was a crane cam and i thats the price i got from a local seller around here ...... this is yet another this ones a comp

Operating Range: 1300-6300 RPM
Duration Advertised: 269° Intake / 273° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'': 216° Intake / 220° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .525'' Intake / .532'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 114°

$393.00
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #32  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

so what do yall think im thinkin the comp becasue of price and name.... this must be gettin anoying all this "cam talk" lol just wanna get they right one ya kno
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #33  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

THe last oe is the one I just put in a 4.8. I also had it in my truck with the blower. It's a good cam.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 06:52 AM
  #34  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

i think im goin with the Lunati i found one for 300 bucks .. either that or the comp mentioned above
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 08:49 AM
  #35  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

ok heres the verdict tell me what ya think http://www.holley.com/products.asp?product=55003LUN

OR

comp cam
Operating Range: 1300-6300 RPM
Duration Advertised: 269° Intake / 273° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'': 216° Intake / 220° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .525'' Intake / .532'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 114°
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #36  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

I would get the 216/220 out of those 2. I don't like the wide lsa on the one in the link.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 08:42 PM
  #37  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

wide lsa?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #38  
METALMULISHA777's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

wide lsa? whats that mean and waht does it affect
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #39  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

The lobe seperation angle is what I was referring to. Running it on a 112 or 114 will bring the power down a littl ebetter. The idle will also have a little more chop to it.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #40  
Grey Silver's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Allen,Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
The ls6 cam would be a waste of time too. It shouldn't even be considered.
I reaaly like the 01 ls6 cam. Truck went 12.33 @ 110 w/ that cam on a 150 shot. Ran good on motor also. Excellent drivability and no tune required but it helps. Best bang for the buck for a 5.3 truck.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.