GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

CHP intake test with cams...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
marc_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default CHP intake test with cams...

Discussion on this board... here
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Default

that's interesting. In my opinion the lsx price still isn't justified either. that's a good article thanks for posting.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
mudz5.3's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
Default

The LSX will give approx 11 HP and 7lbft for the cam I am going with, definately not worth the dough. Although with the 218/222 it might be a little more. There is a big jump between the 212/218 and the 222/224 so its hard to tell. So on an average, lets say 20 hp increase from the truck to the lsx manifold with my cam. Whats the cost of the lsx again? Maybe one loaded with a direct port wouldn't be a bad investment.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #4  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default

Those are peak numbers listed. Its very possible that the LS6/X intakes pull away from the truck intake at higher rpm levels. I am truly suprised with the numbers from the small cam on the truck intake. Its almost like the truck intake doesn't respond well to lower flow.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:18 AM
  #5  
marc_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Central, MA
Default

Originally Posted by BigTex
I am truly suprised with the numbers from the small cam on the truck intake. Its almost like the truck intake doesn't respond well to lower flow.
Me too...

Maybe it's achille's heel of the intake - like the weaker flow of stock heads at .500" lift.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #6  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

it's probably due to the larger "chamber" (for lack of a better term at the moment) of the truck intake. it has a considerable amount of unused/non-runner space that can cause some serious velocity issue's.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:07 PM
  #7  
Hit Man X's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Default

That's damn interesting to me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
noproblems209
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
12
Aug 10, 2015 06:57 PM
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Aug 7, 2015 09:55 PM
jrplz
GM Parts Classifieds
6
Jul 9, 2015 12:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.