ls6 is better intake then ls2 believe it or not. i posted the info on it before about flow rates and etc. it woudl because of the drivetrain loss why you put more out then truck. but truck motor is stronger

 

its fun to bust *****, and would rather have smaller motor then larger cause of the beating prinicple

 

thanks for the info.

 

When I look at my factory tune with LS1-Edit the cylinder size from the factroy is set at 40.89 cubic inches. 40.89 x 8 = 327.12 Cubic inches.

 

I know the LS1 and LS6 (345 cu.in, actual) are not exactly a 350 cu.in, but they are damn close, and the old vortec 5.7L (348 cu.in, conversion) is a 350 (actual). I believe GM did a engine size change from cu.in. to liter in the early 90s, just to change things up. If you go to Scoggin Dickey website they list LS1 & LS6 as a 350 cu.in. If someone says they an 02 350 from a vette I am pretty sure they are going to have an LS1 or LS6, they will not have an old SBC 350. All I am saying if someone says they have a 5.7 then it should be automaticaly assumed it's a 350 and vice versa, and there is no need to get really technical about it.

When I stated "actual" I mean finding the actual volume of the engine (bore and stroke), and "conversion" is converting from Liters to Cubic Inches.

If you still disagree then I have this for you