GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Cam question, yes again.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #1  
CHAGO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Houston
Default Cam question, yes again.........

Can someone tell me if this would be a good cam with a stock converter:
6.0 motor of course.......
222 222 .566 .566 112



-TIA-
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

From what the cam guys have been telling me, 206 intake is as high as you want to go with a 5.3L, 210-212 intake with a 6.0L, if you don't want to lose anything down low....anything bigger than that and you'll end up wanting an aftermarket converter.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #3  
CHAGO's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Houston
Default

Originally Posted by Naked AV
From what the cam guys have been telling me, 206 intake is as high as you want to go with a 5.3L, 210-212 intake with a 6.0L, if you don't want to lose anything down low....anything bigger than that and you'll end up wanting an aftermarket converter.
Ive seen guys run the 212/218 Comp I think in a 5.3 with no problems...
someone told me it was the lift numbers that you have to watch out for.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #4  
F8L Z71's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

There have been guys putting up threads syaing how their 212/218ish cams work well without a converter but I'm sure you're going to lose some bottom end no matter what. I think you just have to decide #1 how do you want to drive the truck #2 how high do you wanna spin it.

Since I never tried a cam smaller then an 02' Z06 I can't say how the small ones work but I will say stay away from that cam or my 226cam if you wanna run well on a stock converter... But I did trap 97mph with the 226cam and headers/tune/converter on a raceweight of 4900lbs.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 04:08 PM
  #5  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default


illnali, your sig pic is
dont change it anymore
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #6  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3

illnali, your sig pic is
dont change it anymore
Agreed, looks cool!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #7  
creederado's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by ILLNALI
Can someone tell me if this would be a good cam with a stock converter:
6.0 motor of course.......
222 222 .566 .566 112



-TIA-

"well i really wont be upgrading at all, the truck isnt going to get anymore performance mods than what I have."



Thats more like it.
I'd say go for it
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Aug 9, 2015 04:34 PM
Jake75
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
6
Aug 5, 2015 01:26 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Jul 26, 2015 10:57 PM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.