GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Best LOW-MID torque cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #21  
aksz71's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: fort payne ,al
Default

Originally Posted by Modern_Muscle
A friend who works at the dealership has given me this info, so I know it to be true. They still have provisions for the sensors.

This engine is configured in four displacements, 293 (4.8L), 325 (5.3L), 346 (5.7L), and 364 (6.0L)

i agree with thunder550 but also modern muscle half the damn ppl at dealerships dont know alot of what they think they know and i have alot of friends at dealerships and i just let them say what they say even though its wrong and 5 of them are techs and they dont have a clue about alot of the stuff
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #22  
ZR1 DREAMING's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,277
Likes: 1
From: Ham Lake, MN
Default

LOL... dealership said so so I know it's true! LMAO, that's great
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #23  
LMSeven's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZR1 DREAMING
LOL... dealership said so so I know it's true! LMAO, that's great
Sig materiel.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
ForcedTQ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Northern CA
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Modern_Muscle
A friend who works at the dealership has given me this info, so I know it to be true. They still have provisions for the sensors.

This engine is configured in four displacements, 293 (4.8L), 325 (5.3L), 346 (5.7L), and 364 (6.0L)
Your buddy would do well to either A) keep his mouth shut when people ask him questions about things that he does not fully understand, or B) be proactive and research to educate himself on such matters that he would like to relay to other folks; let him in on this site, we'll edumacate him!

I hate going to dealerships and asking for specific parts for something that I have researched thoroughly only to have the holier than thou counterperson cop an attitude when I insist I know what I am talking about. It's funny when a few of them actually own up to their mistakes.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #25  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

As to a torque cam, reinstall the stock cam 4* advanced...........
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #26  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by 2001c3driver
As to a torque cam, reinstall the stock cam 4* advanced...........
thats alot of trouble to go through, taking it all down like that and keepin the stock cam.. but thats just my opinion.. comp 212 218
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #27  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

I thought it would be a neat idea- but yeah, it's a bunch of work. For torque my vote goes to Comp Cams XR259HR 206/212 .515/.522 112. It's like a little L-92 cam; 234/240 .595/.609 112...............
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 03:29 AM
  #28  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock Texas
Default

Bringin it back to life with a couple thoughts

trying to make a cam like the LS2 (which we are still trying to get our hands on an early run one)

Looking for something, or a possible custom grind close to these

202/206
204/207

Both with a 585 to a 605 lift, and a 112 LSA.

anyone know of anywhere that can make one like this?

I want low duration, but high lift. (is that even possible???!!)
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 04:28 AM
  #29  
norris_83's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Default

yes it is... why go for a lopey cam? stick to a 114 or more to get that almost stock sound @ idle...

Im running the XR265HR and it was a nice improvement over stock, although if I could, I would go back and get a cam with more
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #30  
StrokerAce03's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by norris_83
yes it is... why go for a lopey cam? stick to a 114 or more to get that almost stock sound @ idle...

Im running the XR265HR and it was a nice improvement over stock, although if I could, I would go back and get a cam with more
I wouldn't consider any of those lopey; lsa plays a small part in the lope. Most all lope is in the overlap. The lsa will determine the powerband more than anything.

That being said; the Vinci ultra torque cam would be a great choice. Its a 210/218 .551 with an lsa choice of anywhere from 112 to 116. Bud's 206/212 would be a damn good one too. Acutally I just pretty much restated Bud's post
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 AM.