GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

bad question...

Old Jun 4, 2005 | 03:46 AM
  #1  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default bad question...

any estimates on how much a 15* difference in temperature can affect e/t's in the 1/8??

more specific...from around 70 to around 85*

my et in the 1/8 dropped .08 after getting tuned by nelson performance and the temperature was hotter this time around. im looking to get a good estimate of what ive gained with the temp difference.

ive only got about 100 miles on the tune and hear its a good 3-400 miles before it really kicks in cant wait
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #2  
nativetexan's Avatar
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: East Texas
Default

Find you one of those ET calculators. For every 10 degrees rise in temperature you will typically see 1% less horsepower. This is a rule-of-thumb formula. Humidity and barometric pressure also have an effect on our engines.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #3  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

yeah, i figured there were too many factors to figure it out. oh well, i gained in the 1/8 on a hotter more humid day 2. thumbs up from me!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 09:29 PM
  #4  
v8
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Default

you last ran the truck with us in late april right?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 01:49 AM
  #5  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

yeah that was my last run(april). i ran at hmp last night, and was wanting to compare my times at the same track.

so far my times at hrp seem to be better than hmp for some reason. after weight reduction i couldnt get anywhere near the times i got at hrp.

the best i could get on weight reduction last night was a 9.70@74.07mph

at hrp i got a 9.56@74.72, but that was kinda a freak run. is a 2.191 60' time normal in an ecsb 5.3??? i did get a bit of wheel spin so im hoping a new set of tires will set me straight. im on a set of 245/70-17 so traction can get sloppy. hopefully a 275/60-17 will help the times.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #6  
smokeydoge's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Nice results, man
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #7  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

I will say that HMP is a horrible track as far as track prep. The track has no traction whatsoever. I went to HMP with my current setup and ran 2.3-2.4's 60's and the very next weekend went to HRP and was pulling 2.1 60's. Same setup both times on street tires.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #8  
smokeydoge's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

I'll second that- HMP has crap gription.....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RustyD
8-Lug Truck Performance
4
May 23, 2016 07:04 PM
00loudchevy
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
3
Dec 3, 2015 05:54 PM
dsbodley
New Members
1
Nov 14, 2015 09:46 PM
lukn4trbl355
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
7
Oct 21, 2015 11:19 PM
Chevy305
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
Sep 28, 2015 09:21 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.