Anyone put 1.85 or 1.80 RRs in a 5.3?
#1
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Prairieville. La.
Wondering if anyone has put these RRs in a 5.3 and tested them? LS1.com has 2 threads. One gained 9 h.p. and the other lost 13
. He got it back when he put the 1.7s back in.
. He got it back when he put the 1.7s back in.
#2
I don't see how you could lose that much hp. They probably didn't set the valve lash right or something. 9hp gain seems realistic. I've never messed with them on LSx engines, but with my Camaro, and gen 1 SBC's you typically see 1.5-2mph gain in the 1/4, which is about 10-20hp (rough estimate) most likely 10-15hp with our trucks.
IMO if you don't have a cam, then do that, because it would be more cost/performance effective. You'll get more lift/duration, and better lobe profiles/ramp rates with an aftermarket cam than you would with 1.8's. I'll probably be about the same price too. JMO.
IMO if you don't have a cam, then do that, because it would be more cost/performance effective. You'll get more lift/duration, and better lobe profiles/ramp rates with an aftermarket cam than you would with 1.8's. I'll probably be about the same price too. JMO.
#4
I put 1.85 rockers on my 5.3. At the same time I also put on Gibson shorty headers on. Nver dynoed before or after, but I could feel a pretty good difference, especially at part throttle.
#5
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Prairieville. La.
Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
IMO if you don't have a cam, then do that, because it would be more cost/performance effective. You'll get more lift/duration, and better lobe profiles/ramp rates with an aftermarket cam than you would with 1.8's. I'll probably be about the same price too. JMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



