Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Anyone put 1.85 or 1.80 RRs in a 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2004, 08:03 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Prairieville. La.
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Anyone put 1.85 or 1.80 RRs in a 5.3?

Wondering if anyone has put these RRs in a 5.3 and tested them? LS1.com has 2 threads. One gained 9 h.p. and the other lost 13 . He got it back when he put the 1.7s back in.
Old 06-03-2004, 09:25 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
vanillagorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't see how you could lose that much hp. They probably didn't set the valve lash right or something. 9hp gain seems realistic. I've never messed with them on LSx engines, but with my Camaro, and gen 1 SBC's you typically see 1.5-2mph gain in the 1/4, which is about 10-20hp (rough estimate) most likely 10-15hp with our trucks.

IMO if you don't have a cam, then do that, because it would be more cost/performance effective. You'll get more lift/duration, and better lobe profiles/ramp rates with an aftermarket cam than you would with 1.8's. I'll probably be about the same price too. JMO.
Old 06-03-2004, 09:50 PM
  #3  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
hallsj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fort Walton Beach, Fl
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I put 1.85's in a 5.7 with a .522/.529 cam. Don't have any new numbers, but SOTP was considerably more than I expected.
Old 06-03-2004, 10:04 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I put 1.85 rockers on my 5.3. At the same time I also put on Gibson shorty headers on. Nver dynoed before or after, but I could feel a pretty good difference, especially at part throttle.
Old 06-04-2004, 03:58 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Prairieville. La.
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
IMO if you don't have a cam, then do that, because it would be more cost/performance effective. You'll get more lift/duration, and better lobe profiles/ramp rates with an aftermarket cam than you would with 1.8's. I'll probably be about the same price too. JMO.
I have some '98-'00 LS1 cams available to me for $25 but don't want to lose any low end power. By my calculations 1.8 - 1.85 puts me in the same lift range but sith less lobe separation and duration. ON PAPER I would end up with top end gains & no low end loss. (The dude that lost h.p. lost it above 4000 rpm.????)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B.love18
New Members
8
09-21-2015 08:31 PM
fastjweb
Drag Racing
20
08-15-2015 10:47 AM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-08-2015 07:59 PM
MS3Z
FUEL SYSTEMS
8
07-30-2015 06:17 PM
elpyro89
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
07-28-2015 05:51 PM



Quick Reply: Anyone put 1.85 or 1.80 RRs in a 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.