Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.0l Burban vs. 8.1l Yukon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2004, 12:36 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
DrHoho02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 6.0l Burban vs. 8.1l Yukon

While I was shopping for a new 04 2500 Crew Cab. The dealer has 2 great deals on a 2003 6.0L 2500 Burban and a 2003 8.1l 2500 Yukon. Both are
similiarly equipped being both are LT. Which would u guys take the 6.0l or the 8.1l?
Old 08-19-2004, 12:59 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

8.1. fuel milage isn't that much different and it's hard to beat the extra power. what's the gear?
Old 08-19-2004, 01:15 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
DrHoho02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default gearing

That I will have to look into. I was just concerned over the 8.1l using too much oil. I have a sidemount Magnacharger that I hope will fit on the 6.0l if I decide to go that way.
Old 08-19-2004, 01:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
Flem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ferndale, MI
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

6.0L all the way the 8.1 is a dinosaur.
Old 08-19-2004, 01:53 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrHoho02
That I will have to look into. I was just concerned over the 8.1l using too much oil. I have a sidemount Magnacharger that I hope will fit on the 6.0l if I decide to go that way.
the 01' and 02's had alot of problems with using oil, the newer one's aren't as bad.
Old 08-19-2004, 01:57 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
spearfish3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 6.0 in my truck and wish every day that I had an 8.1. The extra torque would be very nice, especially offroad and towing. The saying there is no replacement for displacement is true.
Old 08-19-2004, 02:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
tbyrne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mass
Posts: 8,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from a 2001 6.0 Suburban to a 2002 8.1 Suburban. I'm very happy with the choice!



2002 8.1 Silverado HD - Full Throttle lift, 37" tires, 4.56 gears, Comp Cam, TOG headers, Volant induction plus more! Heads, cam and intake manifold upgrade coming soon!
2002 8.1 Suburban -Intercooled Whipple supercharger, 22" wheels/tires + more - 407hp/558 ft-lb torque at the rear wheels - 13.93 @ 95.79 MPH

www.tbyrnemotorsports.com
Old 08-19-2004, 02:33 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: C.S. TX
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

6.0 - more mods out there for less $$, better gas mileage, and plenty of power stock. If you tow a bunch, and you want to leave it stock, then definately go for the 8.1. If you plan on modding at all though, then don't bother.
Old 08-19-2004, 02:42 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
spearfish3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would be willing to bet a SC 8.1 could eat a SC 6.0. Mod for mod an 8.1 will beat a 6.0.
Old 08-19-2004, 03:01 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

8.1 all the way. there is a quite a bit of stuff coming out for it right now


Quick Reply: 6.0l Burban vs. 8.1l Yukon



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.