GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

6.0 cam choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #31  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
You'll lose low end with the 220. I lost low end with my 222/226. This is common sense, the cam moves the powerband up and increases valve overlap....less cylinder pressure down low to make torque. I have read that the low 210s duration cams work very well for 6.0 towing. I think Richard@WCCH had a 212/212 in his 6.0 truck and said it towed like raped ape.
Thanks. Most people say its a 6.0 go big 224, 228 or something. WCCH?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #32  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Okay a quick google came up with west coast cylinder heads
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #33  
badz24s's Avatar
formerly b4vwannabe (2/4/2012)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: McComb, MS
Default

I don't mean to hijack the thread, but are y'all saying a 220 cam is "a baby cam" for a 6.0?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 11:45 PM
  #34  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by b4vwannabe
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but are y'all saying a 220 cam is "a baby cam" for a 6.0?
I think so
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #35  
Bama2door's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Default

Originally Posted by b4vwannabe
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but are y'all saying a 220 cam is "a baby cam" for a 6.0?
I would say so, I have a tr224 in my 6.0 and think it's pretty tame.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 11:53 AM
  #36  
05gmcsierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: van nuys CA
Default

Originally Posted by b4vwannabe
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but are y'all saying a 220 cam is "a baby cam" for a 6.0?
It just dwpends what u want ur 6.0 for. Towing yea its fine. Performance Yeap too small..
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 04:48 PM
  #37  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

well i was looking for towing and still leaning more towards the 212/218 high lift. what you think?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #38  
00silvylq4's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Lawton, OK
Default

Originally Posted by Suddog
I have the 212/218 in my LQ9...it pulls hard as hell throughout w/ the TB stall. I may go with the TR220 (I already have LS6 springs)
Did you get the high or low lift? Why?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #39  
05gmcsierra's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: van nuys CA
Default

If ur thinking about the 212/218 look into the lunati voodoo 60510. I ran it in my 5.3 no stall and loved it. Its on a 113 Lsa even more torque ealier. Ur gonna have a torqy 6.0...probably only pull to 6100. Mine pulled to 6200 but im a 5.3
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 12:44 AM
  #40  
Suddog's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Guam
Default

Originally Posted by 00silvylq4
Did you get the high or low lift? Why?
I originally installed it in my 4.8, then went into my LQ9. I got the low lift for more torque and it worked well with LS6 springs. Price wasnt bad as well. Didnt want to go with a very high stall either. This is my DD so a TB TC was perfect for this cam IMO.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.