Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3 l33 or lm7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2012, 08:40 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
06murder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ludowici,ga
Posts: 1,698
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The McCarty Company
Old 09-30-2012, 08:40 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
06murder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ludowici,ga
Posts: 1,698
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Www.mccarty. com
Old 10-01-2012, 07:11 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
blueshifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally I'd go with the L33 for anything other than FI. It is just a better starting point IMO.
Old 10-02-2012, 07:26 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I guess I'm going to lm7 cause i found out about l33 easy break from starter bolt and others when you are on high performance upgrade. I don't want deal with breaking. I found a good deal 2002 lm7 5.3 80,000 miles for $180 dollars. Only I need acceries I can't spelling. Like bracket, ac, alt, ps if you know what I mean. Do you think 5.3 2002 is ok?
Old 10-02-2012, 08:09 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
 
blueshifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If your putting it in the 06 then the 02 will have a drive by cable and your truck is set up for drive by wire.
Old 10-02-2012, 08:52 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Oh I was plan to put 5.3 in 1992 S10 not 2006 silverado.
Old 10-02-2012, 09:51 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
xx_ED_xx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ha, I am doing a 92 s10 as well
Old 10-03-2012, 08:02 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Is 2002 5.3 ok ?
Old 10-05-2012, 11:20 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Good news I'm going buy and pick up engine tomorrow!its only 90,000 mileage on it. It was off the 2002 Tahoe SUV. Will take some pictures update here soon. It's a little dirty but will clean up
Old 10-06-2012, 05:13 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hey. I finished pick up engine today. It look not bad. It's good deal I got it for $200 it's only 90,000 mileage. Lm7 5.3. I didn't relaized it's heads show 862. Do you think summit racing heads eldbrock is same as prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads?


Quick Reply: 5.3 l33 or lm7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.