GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

3.5" catback on 5.3 too big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
KC_kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: KC
Default 3.5" catback on 5.3 too big?

Just curious of opinions on a NNBS 6.2 stock catback on a stock 5.3. Do you think I'll lose any torque with the increase in catback diameter slowing down the exhaust velocity? What about on a 6.0?

Yes, I asked about this a year or so ago and yes I'm bringing it back up for more discussion. Thanks for opinions and any experiences.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 11:04 AM
  #2  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

I don't think you'd really notice any significant difference.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
Gbrown1320's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 4
From: San Marcos, TX
Default

On a stock 5.3 I think you might notice a little torque loss down low, but maybe not if the muffler supplier adequate backpressure? I'm not sure how restrictive the factory 6.2 muffler is?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 03:36 PM
  #4  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 600
From: Rogers, MN
Default

Back pressure is a myth, pretty much every vehicle runs less than 1-3psi of back pressure on a NA engine.

He still have the stock y-pipe and 3 cat converters so whatever comes after them pretty much doesn't matter.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 03:58 PM
  #5  
marineusmc4's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 401
Likes: 2
From: Kansas City
Default

Originally Posted by KC_kid
Just curious of opinions on a NNBS 6.2 stock catback on a stock 5.3. Do you think I'll lose any torque with the increase in catback diameter slowing down the exhaust velocity? What about on a 6.0?

Yes, I asked about this a year or so ago and yes I'm bringing it back up for more discussion. Thanks for opinions and any experiences.
not relevant to your question but what part of KC you in? Overland Park here.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
01SilveradoJakee's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 299
Likes: 6
From: BFE Arizona
Default

Im using Speed Engineering True Dual 3in and its perfect.

The most restitive part of yout exhaust is your manifolds and Cats. Anything after them is just noise...
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 05:32 PM
  #7  
KC_kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: KC
Default

Well that is part of the conversation too... I have Thorley Tri-y's going on also. I know people say the small primaries suck, but that's what I have for now. Not installed yet, but the idea is that they will help with low/mid range torque.
Also, I want a quiet setup, so a stock muffler may get me that. Does the 6.2 muffler flow better than the 5.3?

I'm in Lenexa, near Oak Park Mall, basically OP. And I wish I was Area47 tuned!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 07:35 PM
  #8  
Gbrown1320's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 4
From: San Marcos, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 01SilveradoJakee
Im using Speed Engineering True Dual 3in and its perfect.

The most restitive part of yout exhaust is your manifolds and Cats. Anything after them is just noise...
What engine set-up did you put the true duals on? Did you notice a bump in power? Any loss down low?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
Three6GMC's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 27
From: Corpus Christi
Default

I ran a 6.2 stock catback on my 2011 5.3/6spd. Dynoed 315 tune and catback only with a K&n drop in filter. Stock y and cats. I did this swap literally the first day from picking the truck up from the dealer...

Name:  IMG_0192.jpg
Views: 105
Size:  201.9 KB
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 08:45 PM
  #10  
KC_kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: KC
Default

Originally Posted by Three6GMC
I ran a 6.2 stock catback on my 2011 5.3/6spd. Dynoed 315 tune and catback only with a K&n drop in filter. Stock y and cats. I did this swap literally the first day from picking the truck up from the dealer...
That seems convincing!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.