GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

160 t-stat or 180 t-stat

Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:04 PM
  #11  
1slowsilverado's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach
Default

Oh yea AutoZone now carries the 160 and 180 stat now for around $30 with housing. its a duralast but works the same and is cheaper than a power stat.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #12  
treyZ28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, North Mexico
Default

When your block is cooler, it will wick away head from the cylinders faster and hence mpg loss.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #13  
AintNoHo's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: San Diego,CA
Default

With my supercharger I have a 160* thermostat which makes the engine run at about 175*-180*. I have heard that when the PCM is not tuned for the lower temperature, the engine may run too rich thinking it's still in warm-up enrichment mode giving good throttle response but less milage.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #14  
Yelo's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 1
From: Geneseo, NY
Default

GM has designed these motors to run at ~195º for a reason......within reason engines function better the warmer they are (this is a proven scientific fact!!), The ONLY reason there ever was to go to a lower temp thermostat was when cast-iron heads were popular, cast-iron is a heat-sink and warms up VERY fast, to cool the chambers enough to prevent detonation on hi-po motors 160º thermostats became popular...now that aluminum is used almost exclusively for cylinder heads the 160º thermostat has become a pointless modification.....
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:37 AM
  #15  
dewmanshu's Avatar
Moderately Differentiated
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 27,563
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Yelo
the 160º thermostat has become a pointless modification.....
For NA.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 06:51 AM
  #16  
Whippled 496's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Lake Shore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Yelo
GM has designed these motors to run at ~195º for a reason......within reason engines function better the warmer they are (this is a proven scientific fact!!), The ONLY reason there ever was to go to a lower temp thermostat was when cast-iron heads were popular, cast-iron is a heat-sink and warms up VERY fast, to cool the chambers enough to prevent detonation on hi-po motors 160º thermostats became popular...now that aluminum is used almost exclusively for cylinder heads the 160º thermostat has become a pointless modification.....
I guess thats why my big iron 8100 likes the 160* then.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #17  
1slowsilverado's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Yelo
GM has designed these motors to run at ~195º for a reason......within reason engines function better the warmer they are (this is a proven scientific fact!!), The ONLY reason there ever was to go to a lower temp thermostat was when cast-iron heads were popular, cast-iron is a heat-sink and warms up VERY fast, to cool the chambers enough to prevent detonation on hi-po motors 160º thermostats became popular...now that aluminum is used almost exclusively for cylinder heads the 160º thermostat has become a pointless modification.....
Pointless mod? I would like to see these "Sientific Facts".
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #18  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I'm happy with my 160* stat, but my PCM has been tuned accordingly. Great heat in the winter (actually comes up faster since the stat opens sooner allowing flow sooner), and my trans temps have decreased also. Efans are set to 180* on, 173* off.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #19  
TURBHOE's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville FL.
Default

me too i found over on the tech that these engs perform better in the 170* range as far as mileage i would say tune it correctly and it should be ok i dunno i'll let you know.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #20  
04blackvho's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: austin tx
Default

went with 160 thats
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.