112% Injector Duty Cycle ?!?!?!?!?!?!
#11
Originally Posted by Yelo
So I started tuning today and I'm already regretting it.....
I haven't touched the fuel tables yet with the exception of changing commanded AFR to 13.8 from 14.6....I realize this will cause an increase in fuel flow but I didn't think it would put me at 112% duty cycle @ 5800rpm
. I commanded a lower AFR because I'm having all kinds of false knock issues and I had to zero out the base knock retard table to get rid of it (more on that later) and I wanted a slightly safer AFR to work with.
some help here would be appreciated.......
I haven't touched the fuel tables yet with the exception of changing commanded AFR to 13.8 from 14.6....I realize this will cause an increase in fuel flow but I didn't think it would put me at 112% duty cycle @ 5800rpm
. I commanded a lower AFR because I'm having all kinds of false knock issues and I had to zero out the base knock retard table to get rid of it (more on that later) and I wanted a slightly safer AFR to work with.some help here would be appreciated.......
With stoich at 14.6, a PE multiplier of 1.2 would yield 12.1:1 AFR
With stoich redefined to 13.8, a PE multiplier of 1.2 would yield 11.5:1 AFR
Last edited by dc_justin; Jan 13, 2006 at 07:48 PM.
#12
Originally Posted by dc_justin
With stoich at 14.6, a PE multiplier of 1.2 would yield 12.1:1 AFR
With stoich redefined to 13.8, a PE multiplier of would yield 11.5:1 AFR
With stoich redefined to 13.8, a PE multiplier of would yield 11.5:1 AFR
#13
Originally Posted by Flyer
Fla, I'm not sure what to think of your situation. I don't think you would be maxing the injectors that soon. I had the MAF maxing at 60lbs somewhere around 5200 rpm, running the motor all the way up to 6600, and had no problems. This was on a 5.3 with a RADIX and a cam pushing 8 or 9 psi.
I think maybe your tune is running a bit rich and I know for a fact your MAF tables are not what they should be. The MAF should read no more than 60lbs. How much boost are you seeing?
I think maybe your tune is running a bit rich and I know for a fact your MAF tables are not what they should be. The MAF should read no more than 60lbs. How much boost are you seeing?
And you are correct we sent the 13500HZ fail out the window and tweaked the MAF table. We are still throwing timing at this thing to see what it will take. So far 22* and no KR. Bud8Fan, when I see 410 I will drive over and we will line em up!!!
#15
Originally Posted by FlaBouy
I see 11.5 to 12 PSI on the guage at 5800rpm. We are running slightly rich since I am still running stock fuel pump and we want to protect the 5.3L at 12psi. But I also have a wideband on order so we will know more shortly. At that point I think we go speed density unless I get the LQ9 built before that.
And you are correct we sent the 13500HZ fail out the window and tweaked the MAF table. We are still throwing timing at this thing to see what it will take. So far 22* and no KR. Bud8Fan, when I see 410 I will drive over and we will line em up!!! 
And you are correct we sent the 13500HZ fail out the window and tweaked the MAF table. We are still throwing timing at this thing to see what it will take. So far 22* and no KR. Bud8Fan, when I see 410 I will drive over and we will line em up!!! 
You're not going speed density unless you have the ability to change the PCM with something like HPTuners 2bar SD tuning or something. Boost needs the map unless you can extend the VE table on.
#16
We are not running rich because of the pump. Maybe I stated it wrong. We richened the mix in HP tuners because we think we are getting lean up top. We are getting a LC-1 to look at it a little closer. BTW, I am getting a larger intank pump and when we get the Enhanced USB I/O cable I paid for a couple months ago we can go to a speed density tune and yes a 2bar MAP.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
3
Oct 28, 2015 08:24 AM
Pontiac Derek
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 19, 2015 01:49 PM




