Torque Specs: U-Joint strap bolts?
#11
Thank you for posting that correction. There are a lot of people out there who might have actually taken that wrong figure and used it. I googled for the U joint bolt torque and this was the first thread that came up.
#12
and the crank bolt requires nut busting tight.
surely you would have known 59 ft lb seems a wee bit high
just zip it in with an electric impact and stop after about 5 clicks. the only torque specs that i follow anymore are head bolts.
just zip it in with an electric impact and stop after about 5 clicks. the only torque specs that i follow anymore are head bolts.
#13
To the *** hole who said 59 ft on torque spec **** you. Why would you put the wrong information like an *** hole. Doesn't matter if you thought you were being cute and silly **** you hard in the ***. Broken bolt later with an hour of getting it out again **** you gard mother ****** I will ******* knee you in the face so hard if I ever know who you are.
#14
#1 reason I find more than one source for information or disregard torque specs all together and do the german spec.
I've probably put 90% of cars back together without torquing a dam thing LOL. Head bolts, rod caps, main caps, crank bolts and specific stuff gets the ole bendy treatment but everything else is a blap blap with an impact lol.
I've probably put 90% of cars back together without torquing a dam thing LOL. Head bolts, rod caps, main caps, crank bolts and specific stuff gets the ole bendy treatment but everything else is a blap blap with an impact lol.
#16
To the *** hole who said 59 ft on torque spec **** you. Why would you put the wrong information like an *** hole. Doesn't matter if you thought you were being cute and silly **** you hard in the ***. Broken bolt later with an hour of getting it out again **** you gard mother ****** I will ******* knee you in the face so hard if I ever know who you are.
I was lucky I didn't brake off the bolt too
#18
Post #7 gives the correct spec, I guess the dummy that believed it can read either 
But in all honestly that really blows my mind how gullible and dumb some people really are, I wouldnt have made a bash post either for the ridicule that would ensue

But in all honestly that really blows my mind how gullible and dumb some people really are, I wouldnt have made a bash post either for the ridicule that would ensue
#19
After hearing your desperate plea for the simple process of reapplying a nut to the thingy with the spirals, I noticed some of the comments were rude, uninformed & may have put you in danger as well as your viewerships safety(Im sure thats not too many, however).
It would seem my vehicle is a good example as it has 400k and this was my first replacment of the drivers shaft.
My drivers shaft was a simple removal. I used a 90mm set of tin snips to cut and remove the zip ties that held the drivers shaft to the part that spins the rear tires at the same time.
i reapplied the new drivers shaft into the vehicles transmission hole.
I then banged the heck out of finger tips when reintroducing the other end because it was not connected.
NEXT, I then applied NEW weather resistant zipties in the mannor the old ones were. As far as torque, I took them as snug as possible, then cut off the excess product.
I wanted this installation to last so I utilized an extra zip for any extra torque produced as I went from aluminum to steel shafts.
I hope this helps you & your viewership when reapplying a new drivers shaft to your vehicle properly as well as any torque specs required for the strap jacks(thats what brand mine were).
Safe Driving-
Dale
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zblee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
63
Jun 10, 2023 01:25 PM
shupe
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
0
Aug 5, 2015 06:45 PM








