GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Drag tires for 20's?

Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #51  
unklej's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
I suppose with your above formula, someone; anyone could make a generic QRG to see what effect that larger/different tire/wheel combo might have on performance vs. stock (base #'s)

Here is a web site that had a whole bunch of equations...

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html

I hope it helps
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #52  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
Funny thing was I asked Blownchevy for a job yesterday. I guess I will just have to settle working for my current company (its not all bad, my business is booming )

Jeff
I see, you want to design a "super modified roots blower", now that's cool!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #53  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
Here is a web site that had a whole bunch of equations...

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html

I hope it helps
not to a dummy like me but thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #54  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
Funny thing was I asked Blownchevy for a job yesterday. I guess I will just have to settle working for my current company (its not all bad, my business is booming )

Jeff

Had nothing to do with work!

All personal

damn women
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #55  
tooquick2beslo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
Well, its all about moments of inertia. The futher the weight is from the axis of rotation, the more inertia you have and the more force it takes to get wheel spinning. Now if you want to bring in overall tire diameter, that throws everything off. You would really need to do a hand calculation to figure out which is the lesser of two evils.

But, to break it down, a 30" od tire on a 16" rim with a weight of 55# will have less inertia than a 30" od tire on a 20" rim with a weight of 55#. Thus, the 16" combo would require less force to break the inertia forces....

The Moment of inertia equation for a hoop is I=mr^2 (m = mass, r = is the radial dimension where the mass is located) So lets just guess that the mass is located on a 16" rim combo at r = 10" and r = 12" on a 20" rim combo.

I(16") = 55*10^2 = 5500
I(20") = 55*12^2 = 7900

For linear motion F=ma, for rotational motion t=I*angular acceleration.

So with the same anguler acceleration you would need more rotational force.


Just like Newton said, bodies in motion want to say in motion and bodies at rest want to stay at rest. Inertia is the key.

Jeff
Ok I like to make a correction here. I am also working on a mechanical engineering degree.

r= radius correct ?

Well last time I checked. 16/2=8" ?

And wouldnt the 20" diameter be a 10" radius ?

So the equation would go like this:

I(16") = 55*8^2 = 3520
I(20") = 55*10^2 = 5500 ???

I mean maybe I am wrong......
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #56  
O3GMC's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip


and it came from above, so let it be written
It has been written, so let it be done!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #57  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by O3GMC
It has been written, so let it be done!
hahahahaha, didn't think anyone would get that reference, hahahahahaha

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:01 PM
  #58  
unklej's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Well, yes and no. I was making a guess where the heart of the mass would be on the wheel and tire combo. So the overall diameter would be 30". Anyway, that equation is really not valid if you want to get the actual moment of inertia for a rim and tire, it was just used to simplify the explanation.

If you want true moments of inertia, I would recommend modeling the rim in tire in a 3-D CAD software and use the mass calculator to fine the true moment of inertia.

Jeff
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:03 PM
  #59  
moregrip's Avatar
Thread Starter
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by unklej
Well, yes and no. I was making a guess where the heart of the mass would be on the wheel and tire combo. So the overall diameter would be 30". Anyway, that equation is really not valid if you want to get the actual moment of inertia for a rim and tire, it was just used to simplify the explanation.

If you want true moments of inertia, I would recommend modeling the rim in tire in a 3-D CAD software and use the mass calculator to fine the true moment of inertia.

Jeff
oh brother
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #60  
unklej's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

This is totally getting out of hand... Honestly "I work for the government, and I'm here to help you" hahahaha
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.