Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

the beast my arse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2006, 03:25 AM
  #1  
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default the beast my ****

this is what GM calls the beast. suppose to be the strongest version of planetry gears for the 4l60e

look closely youll see the cracks and its stripped the spline out.



this is what went on my truck. i guess thats why they call my cam the torquer lol
Attached Thumbnails the beast my arse-may17_001.jpg   the beast my arse-may17_002.jpg   the beast my arse-may17_003.jpg  
Old 05-18-2006, 05:57 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
CoonToot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That sucks...you must have thrown a LOT of twist at that. Ithought the Beast was the sunshell, not the planetary set
Old 05-18-2006, 09:48 AM
  #3  
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

from what i gatherd that was it, could be wrong i read it on the net and in GM high tech performance
Old 05-18-2006, 10:14 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What a POS! The 4L60e should have never happend. That 700r4 design should have been scrapped years ago. It was designed for 180 hp 305's to get good mileage and a low first gear to make up for their lack of power. Two words, Torque Management. It would have never been invented or needed if they would have scrapped the inferrior design back in the early 90's.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:47 AM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
vanillagorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05-18-2006, 12:06 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
RoninsDenali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CoonToot
That sucks...you must have thrown a LOT of twist at that. Ithought the Beast was the sunshell, not the planetary set
The 'beast' is the upgraded sunshell.

Any of the 5-pinion planetaries are just plain ol' 4L65 planetaries. Although i am scared about the amount of torque needed to crack their casings in half....
Old 05-18-2006, 12:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
CoonToot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RoninsDenali
The 'beast' is the upgraded sunshell.

Any of the 5-pinion planetaries are just plain ol' 4L65 planetaries. Although i am scared about the amount of torque needed to crack their casings in half....
Thanks for the confirmation on the sunshell.

I also have been told that there are GM planetaries, which are supposed to be the strongest available, and then there are aftermarket planetaries which are known for not holding up under high power cicumstances. Could it be the tranny builder used the aftermarket one and that's why we are seeing a failure? The price for the parts and labor sure seem to point that way. Maybe I'm wrong, but maybe I'm not. Just a thought.
Old 05-18-2006, 01:15 PM
  #8  
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
What a POS! The 4L60e should have never happend. That 700r4 design should have been scrapped years ago. It was designed for 180 hp 305's to get good mileage and a low first gear to make up for their lack of power. Two words, Torque Management. It would have never been invented or needed if they would have scrapped the inferrior design back in the early 90's.
yea in my situation i dont have torque management anymore.
Old 05-18-2006, 02:03 PM
  #9  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
white1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sittin on jackstands
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Torque management is for sissies
Old 05-18-2006, 02:12 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
RoninsDenali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CoonToot
Thanks for the confirmation on the sunshell.

I also have been told that there are GM planetaries, which are supposed to be the strongest available, and then there are aftermarket planetaries which are known for not holding up under high power cicumstances. Could it be the tranny builder used the aftermarket one and that's why we are seeing a failure? The price for the parts and labor sure seem to point that way. Maybe I'm wrong, but maybe I'm not. Just a thought.

Its quite possible, as i've heard that the GM Planetaries are somewhat expensive. But are made from a lot better material than their aftermarket planetaries. Heck, mine are out of my tranny as we speak, and even after 83,000 miles they still meet the original specs, as well as the machining lines are still quite visable.


Quick Reply: the beast my arse



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.