GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

3.23's to 3.73's - mileage concerns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #1  
NBred94's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Default 3.23's to 3.73's - mileage concerns

Thinking about a gear swap in the near future, but do not want to send my mileage plummeting. Most of my driving is a long (40 mile) commute with the morning half being around 70 mph most of the way and the way home usually is about evenly split between stop and go and clear freeway.

I have read that some with a 2wd 5.3 and 3.73's get about the same mileage that I do now (19-20 mpg), and was hoping to get a few more responses. I'm hoping that a 10% increase in engine revolutions does not directly translate into 10% more fuel consumed. There are obviously many more variables, but in general what is the effect on highway mileage from a gear swap such as this? Also would a good cat-back, CAI and tune be able to make up for any potential losses?

The 3.23's seep to be pretty conservative for such a heavy truck, not sure why the factory didn't start with at least 3.42's.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

i can tell you this. when you get the 3.73's, you'd wish you'd went with 4.10's. i went from 3.42's to 4.10's and i still get 20mpg on the hwy.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #3  
Breeze's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
From: Md
Default

Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
i can tell you this. when you get the 3.73's, you'd wish you'd went with 4.10's. i went from 3.42's to 4.10's and i still get 20mpg on the hwy.
Thats right I went with 3.90s from 3.42 and it never hurt my mileage now that I put on the Radix S/C im now getting 22+mpg.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #4  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

i can pull 23mpg on freeway @ 65mph.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

The key to mileage with our motors is RPM's. If I had it to do over again I would have stayed with my 3.73's instead of going to 4.10's, for two reasons:

1) With 4.10's I lost 2+ MPG on the freeway
2) After 20-25 mph or so the 4.10's have zero benefit.

As far as I am concerned, 3.73's are the ideal highway gear for trucks with 31-32 inch tires. At 70-75 MPH you are crusing at 2000 RPM or so which is still within the sweet spot as far as gas mileage for our motors (1800-2000 RPM). The further you go over 2000 RPM, your mileage starts to dive.

I agree with you that 3.23 are ridiculous for a big-*** crew cab truck. I bet 3.73's will serve you just fine, and with all of your time on the freeway, with mileage a concern, they are likely a perfect fit.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

With 3.73's and 30.5" tires and 4.10's with 30.5" tires I averaged 14something mpg's with both all day everyday.

With 4.10's and 32" tires and a Radix I average 12mpg's with a "highway only" best of 17mpg's at 75mph cruising.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
From: Spring, TX
Post

From the performance aspect of this, the 3.73 gears are the way to go.
To keep your miliage about the same on HWY, keep the RPM's at 1900.
That will get you to about 67 MPH. You can run 70 MPH with little loss in MPG.
After 2000 RPM's the engine starts going into it's power band and of course your miliage will suffer.
At 65 MPH you should get about 18 MPG w/ 3.73's.
You want gas miliage or better performance? That's what your going to have to ask yourself.

Jim
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #8  
NBred94's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Default

Thanks for the input guys. I knew that there would be some trade-off, but wanted to see how big the payment would be for the extra performance.

If I had an RCSB that I was planning on taking to the track often, I'd probably consider the 4.10's seriously, but this is going to be my commuter/long trip vehicle, so 3.73's sounded like a good compromise.

Mods: Thanks for moving to the drivetrain forum, I didn't know whether this was primarily a mileage (and thus general) topic or a gear topic. I just don't want to be thought of as the guy that doesn't know how to use a message board.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #9  
ap2002's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

yeah I would go with 3:23's as well,,, I dont remember seeing you around the site, but welcome aboard anyways... hey what part of houston are you from???
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #10  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by NBred94
Mods: Thanks for moving to the drivetrain forum, I didn't know whether this was primarily a mileage (and thus general) topic or a gear topic. I just don't want to be thought of as the guy that doesn't know how to use a message board.
No problem, don't get to many thank you's around here so here's to ya
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.