what times are you running with your turbo setup? (1/8th, 1/4 mile)
#21
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm making boost, the gauge reads a steady 7psi once I get into it
my 60 foot was pretty much every time around 2.5 lol
I think Nelson really might have me on a safe tune, as I told him I am running it non-intercooled and as a daily driver. So now I'm wondering if I should just leave it as is, since I don't want to end up blowing something up
I wasn't launching it at all, just a regular take off
my 60 foot was pretty much every time around 2.5 lol
I think Nelson really might have me on a safe tune, as I told him I am running it non-intercooled and as a daily driver. So now I'm wondering if I should just leave it as is, since I don't want to end up blowing something up
I wasn't launching it at all, just a regular take off
Last edited by TXjeepTJ; 04-11-2011 at 06:33 PM.
#22
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
I'm making boost, the gauge reads a steady 7psi once I get into it
I think Nelson really might have me on a safe tune, as I told him I am running it non-intercooled and as a daily driver. So now I'm wondering if I should just leave it as is, since I don't want to end up blowing something up
I think Nelson really might have me on a safe tune, as I told him I am running it non-intercooled and as a daily driver. So now I'm wondering if I should just leave it as is, since I don't want to end up blowing something up
#23
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
It seems to be getting more and more popular on this forum to leave out of the first post the most important piece of information.
Your truck's slow, you have a turbo, but no inter-cooling. Nothing odd or new there. If you let us know in the first post that you didn't have an intercooler, the question as to why your truck is so slow would have been answered in the second post. But no, it took twenty posts for you to reveal that tidbit of information.
#29
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to be getting more and more popular on this forum to leave out of the first post the most important piece of information.
Your truck's slow, you have a turbo, but no inter-cooling. Nothing odd or new there. If you let us know in the first post that you didn't have an intercooler, the question as to why your truck is so slow would have been answered in the second post. But no, it took twenty posts for you to reveal that tidbit of information.
Your truck's slow, you have a turbo, but no inter-cooling. Nothing odd or new there. If you let us know in the first post that you didn't have an intercooler, the question as to why your truck is so slow would have been answered in the second post. But no, it took twenty posts for you to reveal that tidbit of information.
a few people on here arn't running an intercooler, so I didn't think it would make/break a trucks performance
I'm getting the intercooler on it mid-May, so just adding the intercooler will solve my slow problems?
#30
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
I don't have pre-intercooler performance times for my truck, but it sure made a big improvement. I don't remember if I had a new tune for the intercooler, it's too long ago, but probably. Mine is not a turbo, but in my case adding the intercooler made more power increase than putting the blower on in the first place. Adding the blower to my stock truck made it run nice, adding the cooler made it run mean.