FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what CR are you turbo guys running?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 10:24 PM
  #11  
05crew's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Benson NC
Default

hahah so 9.2:1 and 18 or so psi on the street would be an easy 750 or so....and go to a 78mm or so turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #12  
Rick_Vor's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CA
Default

10:1 with 10psi (stock LQ9) . 30k miles. Hope I didn't just jinx myself...

Rick
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #13  
TurboBerserker's Avatar
I AM A MOTHERF*CKER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,132
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by skyhighsami
The rule of thumb I was told is that if your compression is low off the boost it will be more of a dog, once the boost comes on though it will be more of a monster because the transistion will be greater from nothing to hold the hell on. I just sold a 408 a built for boost and desided against going that route, it was almost 9.1 but I was planning on lots a boost in my Camaro and shooting for 1000rwhp. I would build it if it were be 10.1 and run 12-15 and meth. That way off boost it will respond a lot better and won't be such a dog.
My 8.6:1 408 in front of a 4L80E is plenty of torqueing off boost

However, mpg sucks ***. lol
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #14  
stock48's Avatar
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 5
From: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Default

9:1 here. It's noticably stronger off boost than my 9.5:1 stock bottem end was, but ring seal is better, 5 more CI's, and bottom end is a little lighter. MPG seems to have taken a little hit with the lower CR.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #15  
SincalT/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Currently In suspense.
Default

Originally Posted by stock48
9:1 here. It's noticably stronger off boost than my 9.5:1 stock bottem end was, but ring seal is better, 5 more CI's, and bottom end is a little lighter. MPG seems to have taken a little hit with the lower CR.

How does wot feel in that beast?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:39 AM
  #16  
performinnorman's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Lees Summit, MO (KC Metro)
Default

I'm running 9.2:1 on my twin turbo LS2 402. I run a methanol kit also.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 01:23 AM
  #17  
1BADAZZSS's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, Mo
Default

Originally Posted by performinnorman
I'm running 9.2:1 on my twin turbo LS2 402. I run a methanol kit also.
Hey Norm, Long time no see. How ya been buddy?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 07:58 AM
  #18  
BigKID's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,947
Likes: 242
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

My 370 is at 9.857:1 with -11cc pistons and 241 heads. Currently running 9.5# but plan on 15-16# very soon. Any additionaly boost from there, I am only a head change away from lowering the compression.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #19  
05crew's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Benson NC
Default

took the first plunge today. pick up my compstar crank and rods from RPM to day. guess 408 it is....LOL going to get a bigger turbo and sell the 1 week old tc-76. should have it next week in the truck!!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #20  
silver-mod-o's Avatar
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,314
Likes: 17
From: SETx
Default

damn you dont waste any time do you LOL...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.