PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Twin turbo 5.3 torture test!

   
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:03 PM
  #21  
black00chev's Avatar
black00chev
Thread Starter
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default
Originally Posted by Atomic
All that and they stopped because of a failed lifter....replace that thing and run 30psi!
That's what I was saying to myself after I read it! 30psi should have them right around 1500hp. Pretty damn awesome for a stock bottom end engine that's really only ment for maybe 400hp .
Reply
0
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:06 PM
  #22  
smokeshow's Avatar
smokeshow
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,741
Likes: 207
From: Detroit
Default
Originally Posted by Atomic
It only took 10 years for people to say eff it and throw on a turbo on a stockish engine and see what happens.
I've been wondering that same thing for a while now...what took them so long?!
Reply
0
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:06 PM
  #23  
Gadgetized's Avatar
Gadgetized
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Default
Here is the link for the Hot Rod article.

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-going-485734/
Reply
0
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #24  
ak2007r6's Avatar
ak2007r6
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Default
Originally Posted by Atomic
It only took 10 years for people to say eff it and throw on a turbo on a stockish engine and see what happens.
Makes me want to find a cheap 00-02 RCSB with a 5.3 and go nuts LOL
Reply
0
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:45 PM
  #25  
black00chev's Avatar
black00chev
Thread Starter
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default
Originally Posted by ak2007r6
Makes me want to find a cheap 00-02 RCSB with a 5.3 and go nuts LOL
Makes me wanna do that to my S10 .
Reply
0
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #26  
o2camaross
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: slidell, LA
Default
For real though, what took everybody so long to realize the power these things can make with a turbo and 15 psi? I wish I would've known sooner lol
Reply
0
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 06:21 AM
  #27  
Sc00by's Avatar
Sc00by
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 813
Likes: 5
From: Florida
Default
So basically when I eventually supercharge my 265K 5.3l LM7 I won't have any problems putting 6-8lbs to it.....sweet!!! (not looking to break any HP records just for some fun).
Reply
0
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 08:20 AM
  #28  
o2camaross
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: slidell, LA
Default
^ turbo it
Reply
0
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:28 PM
  #29  
kush killer's Avatar
kush killer
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Omaha,Nebraska
Default
Originally Posted by o2camaross
Wait, this isn't the same test that Hotrod did? I guess Ill go back and read the article
its a good atricle and correct it is a lm7
Originally Posted by o2camaross
^ turbo it
x100
Reply
0
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:39 PM
  #30  
nonnieselman's Avatar
nonnieselman
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default
so are they goin to do a 6.0 next year??

and not do the heads.. leave them things stock and go.
they lowered the compression on the LM7 from 9.5 to 9.0
Reply
0

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 PM.