FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TVS Tahoe

Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #21  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
I have been wondering the same thing, Allen it should be simple....... You just need a 8 rib setup with a front inlet so it can be overdriven ALLOT....
If they are running the largest crank pulley it seems like they would already be running the 8 rib setup...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #22  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
If they are running the largest crank pulley it seems like they would already be running the 8 rib setup...
Why? The largest one we could fit was about an 8.5" crank pulley and not have any waterpump contact issues.

We're almost done, running around town all friday and today for parts, this sux
Btw, the heater hoses hit the charger intake elbow, so much that they have to be pulled out of the way for installation.
We'll be done with the charger install today, dyno it, then do the cam, then dyno it.


The 383 was a 9.5compression engine, forged, cam, blah blah. It runs very strong! But, we built the engine for more, we would just like to work the engine to it's fullest potential.

I'll have to look into that front drive kit, may be the only way to go.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #23  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I guess I can say that I've seen a larger crank pulley on a 6 rib setup.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #24  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default





Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #25  
bansheerider44's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Bandera, TX
Default

so ready for this.....
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #26  
Leroy_454's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: Ennis, Texas
Default

That looks great. Cant wait to see some results.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #27  
03sierraslt's Avatar
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,007
Likes: 221
From: Western PA
Default

This is why I dont care for the front drive on the maggie's, You could always have the blower drive gears re-cut to change the drive ratio...........
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 10:41 PM
  #28  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

TTT,

Forgot to post up the results,

Recap:
5.3L Tahoe
TVS1900 appx 6-7psi
Small cam, headers

Truck put out 428hp and xxxtq (i'll post up graph later).
Get this, since the Maggies put out so much lowend torque, I chose a cam that had more topend. Max power was about 7,000rpms, yikes. Pulls like a sob on the topend, it's real hiway killer!
It also ran a 106mph in the 1/4 with big *** 22's(i think) Rockstars.
That should be good for a very low 13sec, possibly a high 12sec.

later,
allen
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #29  
Y2KLimited's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
Default

7000 rpms with a 5.3 tahoe damn....

I don't even rev my solid roller 427 that high.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: ODESSA, TX
Default

Those are some dam good numbers!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.