FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TVS Suburban results

Old Sep 26, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #31  
Sambo53's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Pleasanton, TX
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
I have no idea!!

I ran a 2 bar MAP sensor with the 3.4" and 3.2" pulleys which were 5psi and 6.3psi respectively. I had to remove the 2 bar MAP sensor because of tuning issues with it but, going off of the other two pulleys I'm ***UMING that the 2.8" is around 9psi.
Thats cool man, I was just curious, I couldn't ever go over 7-7.5lbs with my 112. Trying to figure out what my next purchase needs to be.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 04:11 PM
  #32  
XLR8NSS's Avatar
Adkoonerstrator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 21,436
Likes: 3
From: Deep in the seedy underworld of Koonerville
Default

On my '05 Silverado SS I was at 7.5lbs with a 3.0" pulley and 112. It also had headers but, that was it.

You could get an overdrive crank pulley, that would get you some more blower rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #33  
Y2KLimited's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
Default

Originally Posted by FarmTruc
I think so too, or maybe cooler weather.

final report:


396hp at 6732 RPMS lol!!
Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
6700rpm with the stock valve springs? If so I might turn my shift points up a bit.

I've also noticed slightly less low end torque but, the 1900 does NOT fall off like the 112 did.
h'mm..........mine wasn't happy floating wise around 5600 rpms from what they said...

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
I have no idea!!

I ran a 2 bar MAP sensor with the 3.4" and 3.2" pulleys which were 5psi and 6.3psi respectively. I had to remove the 2 bar MAP sensor because of tuning issues with it but, going off of the other two pulleys I'm ***UMING that the 2.8" is around 9psi.
My truck has a 2 bar map and the MAF connected but that definetely took some work, my VVT is disabled also, gave some major headaches first round of tuning...
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #34  
viciousknid's Avatar
Where's the Beef?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,382
Likes: 1
From: Dover, Oklahoma
Default

When should you start worrying about valve float running that many rpms on a stock cam/springs?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #35  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

Originally Posted by Y2KLimited
h'mm..........mine wasn't happy floating wise around 5600 rpms from...work, ...

You know I thought that was too much RPM as well, why it makes so much power up top and the engine has no issues with valve float.
So, I verified the RPM pickup on the dyno with hptuners and they very close, off a few rpms, but nothing to post about.

both the TVS Tahoe and this TVS Sub along with the 383 TVS we did, all pulled above 6500rpms with no problem, two of them with stock valves.

I know it's wierd.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #36  
Sambo53's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Pleasanton, TX
Default

Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
On my '05 Silverado SS I was at 7.5lbs with a 3.0" pulley and 112. It also had headers but, that was it.

You could get an overdrive crank pulley, that would get you some more blower rpm.
I already sold my 112, I just need to take it out of my sig now lol.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #37  
D-GTO's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: North of California
Default

Damn nice!! Can't wait to see the results of a lil bit of VVT tuning on one of these
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #38  
MNC5's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
Default

Originally Posted by FarmTruc
Ouch, hopefully mine will turn out higher. I actually got more TQ and Power from a heads, cam and headers install. I'll be pretty disappointed if mines not 500rwhp or better with a 2.8 pulley on TVS 1900
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #39  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,749
Likes: 8
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MNC5
Ouch, hopefully mine will turn out higher. I actually got more TQ and Power from a heads, cam and headers install. I'll be pretty disappointed if mines not 500rwhp or better with a 2.8 pulley on TVS 1900
this was on 5 psi of boost, thats nothing to shake a stick at.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #40  
FarmTruc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Performance Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: san antonio, tx
Default

Originally Posted by MNC5
Ouch, hopefully mine will turn out higher. I actually got more ...TVS 1900

I'm sure it will, all the TVS kits we've done have been impressive.

I'd like to see a 5.3L with some heads, cam and good exhaust make 500hp.
I wonder if 10psi would get it there.

Yours will have to be there!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
calsdad
8-Lug Truck Performance
34
Jun 14, 2023 11:07 PM
moregrip
FORCED INDUCTION
33
Jul 26, 2016 11:21 AM
cheyenne383
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
9
Nov 13, 2015 09:24 AM
old motorhead
FORCED INDUCTION
3
Sep 29, 2015 08:22 PM
ice17
GM Parts Classifieds
5
Sep 22, 2015 05:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.